Pre 1900 heavyweights.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mattdonnellon, Mar 25, 2016.


  1. klompton2

    klompton2 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,973
    5,470
    Feb 10, 2013

    And yet you arent obsessed with me... Until your next post directed at me...
     
  2. reznick

    reznick In the 7.2% Full Member

    15,901
    7,643
    Mar 17, 2010
    It's hard to argue the depth of that era.

    Anyone else feeling a resurgence happening? There are some really good heavyweights in the division right now.
     
  3. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,779
    2,119
    Dec 2, 2006
    good post. Disagree about the rating of Hank Griffin, he was nothing special, but the rest is reasonable. McCoy, I'd have higher and for sure Denver Ed Martin should be in there. Also another "Denver Ed", Smith this time, should be in any top twenty from the 1890's.
     
  4. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,054
    2,529
    Jul 11, 2005
    McCoy was a middleweight, not a light heavyweight. Why mention the draws with Ryan and not the win over the same? He also had the better of the bout with Choynski that was a pre-arranged draw.
    Steve O'Donnell was one of the most skilled and talented heavyweights of the decade, but he was too weak mentally to be a fighter.
    Jim Hall held a win over Tommy Ryan?
     
  5. gregluland

    gregluland Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,317
    33
    Apr 20, 2011
    Just quoting your authoritative knowledge as the greatest most perfect boxing ****yst to have ever lived.





    go smoke some :rasta:rasta:rasta:rasta
     
  6. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    There really was not a light heavyweight division pre 1900.

    McCoy was about 5'11 1/2 with a 76 in reach. A puncher type with mobility and skills he beat much heavier men. His best weight was above 160.
     
  7. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,054
    2,529
    Jul 11, 2005
    I don't think McCoy's best weight was above 160. He was described as fat at 165 pounds vs Jim Stewart in 1908. He made 158 pounds for O'Brien in 1904. I think 156-158 pounds was about right for him.
     
  8. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,779
    2,119
    Dec 2, 2006
    I think it is fair to say that from the Ruhlin fight in 1898 to the Corbett fiasco in 1900, McCoy was a serious player in the heavyweight division.
     
  9. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,054
    2,529
    Jul 11, 2005
    Too bad McCoy and Fitz never met in a real fight, some time in 1898 or 1899. Now, if Fitz lands clean and flush, he wins by KO, obviously, but that's far from certain that he could land such punch if the Kid were in top shape.The reverse result is also a possibility, it's not like Fitz was unknockoutable.
     
  10. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,779
    2,119
    Dec 2, 2006
    McCoy was a bit chinny though....be a great fight, the Kid is criminally underrated.
     
  11. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,054
    2,529
    Jul 11, 2005
    He usually got tagged when he came into the fight careless. He wouldn't be against Fitz. He's the more skillful and clever of the two (both in offense and defense), faster reflexes and hands, quicker feet, and he learned Fitz' short-distance punching technique to perfection. They were both very tricky, probably the Kid has advantage even in this department (despite him being very humble in his reminiscences about Fitz). So that Fitz' only chance is to land the KO, and he has a good chance to do that, but I'd probably have bet on the Kid to outpoint Bob.
     
  12. mattdonnellon

    mattdonnellon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,779
    2,119
    Dec 2, 2006
    That's a very interesting opinion. I would have thought that if Maher could get him on ***** street, then Fitz would surely trap him? But I wouldn't be bullish about it either.
     
  13. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,054
    2,529
    Jul 11, 2005
    I don't know what you talking about. Maher had slightly the better of the fourth round of the fight, but most reporters didn't think McCoy was in any trouble, even less so on ***** street.
     
  14. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. Full Member

    55,255
    10,363
    Jun 29, 2007
    Fitz had a tremendous ability to recuperate from a blow.

    From February 1890 to December 1905, a near 14 year period, Fitz had 49 recorded fights. Only Jeffries knocked him out and his resume of who he meet was stacked with punches.

    Some feel the fight he lost ( Hall ) in 1890 was fixed, so it's possible he went 18 years with only on man stopping him. That is impressive.
     
  15. Senya13

    Senya13 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,054
    2,529
    Jul 11, 2005
    That's not the reason why I think the fight would be won by McCoy on points. I have no doubt the Kid could KO Fitz (but the reverse result has higher probability, Fitz by KO), but we'd probably see the usual more cautious version of McCoy in such bout, and him winning on points.