Will get you further as a fighter? Raw, crude swinging for the fences Foreman like power or the pin point precision punching of fighters like Archie Moore and Jersey Joe Walcott? Coincidentally the only two fighters to ever drop Rocky Marciano. Does either have a serious advantage over the other? How many fighters truly embody the best of both worlds? Joe Louis? Alexis Arguello?
Precision, every time at all weights with no exception, if we are talking serious levels of expertise in one at the expense of the other. Power punchers only have one way to win fights. Precision punchers can win on accumilative KO's, or by points.
Moore had cracking raw power though, in my opinion, and I think he should be on your list of fighters that embody both. Also, Robinson, Tyson was very accurate, and I'd suggest Langford.
It's funny how almost all of the fighters that fit into both categories, that embody the best of both worlds, are among the greatest of all time. Two very important ingredients, yes? Roy Jones deserves mentioning here. His single, rib breaking fighter ending bodyshot against super durable and underrated Virgil Hill was unbelievable, and still is to this day. Felix Trindad as well. A recent post here said that even against Whitaker he was extremely accurate. Something to appreciate about Trinidad that some overlook... His accuracy.
Power gets a fight over quicker than precision. But it depends how the power is delivered. Some fighters rely on their power too much and when it's taken away from them, they are clueless. A fighters style has a lot to do with how successful he is with each of these attributes in question. Usually a precision fighter works his jab and relies soley on scoring type punches. Jabs, combinations, workrate, etc, will always see a fighter through if he's good with all those tools. However when a fighter relies on power he'll obviously be going for 'powerful' punches more often than not. It's a mental thing when a fighter knows he can end a fight with one or two punches, thus he resorts to right hand leads and heavy hooks. And depending on how finely tuned a fighter who relies on 'power' is in a technical sense, he might well load up and telegraph his shots. If a fighter who's a chilling puncher can combine being very precise with his power then that a lovely balance to have of course. Let the knockout come and wait for the right moment. Whats best, power or precision?. It all depends on how technically fine each fighter is and how heavily they rely on either 'power and precision'. Personally I prefer watching precision.
Not many good fighters have no precision. Even guys like Mugabi and Foreman were accurate punchers on a world class level.It was their technique that lacked.
precision always wins over power, a knockout artist will have a hard time landing a clean punch on a guy with a good defense but a guy with surgeon precision on both hands can land and will land cleaner shots no matter what IMO
It depends on the fighter, honestly. Some defensive guys are too slick to be caught, even by pinpoint punchers, but they can be beaten into submission via workrate and brute force.
Usually good boxers dont take clean punches, when they do take them on the button they get accused of having weak chins . You have to set up, time and throw with speed to land flush shots and if your opponents defense is open your at an advantage, and if your punches are more compact and not as wild that again is a big factor if they are landing clean Tyson for instance landed countless flush punches on opponents and thats what was so devastating about him, not necessarily his power Even Foreman in his KOs lands them on the button, Foremans accuracy is an underrated aspect of his game