Premier Boxing Champions: Amir Khan vs. Chris Algieri RBR

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by IntentionalButt, May 29, 2015.


  1. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,088
    Feb 16, 2013
    :rofl superb

    I'd fancy most of the top 10 WW's to knock Khan out based on what I just witnessed.

    I understand now why he turned down a career high payday, a world title shot against Brook. It wouldn't last long, basically as long as it take a brook to land a right hand.
     
  2. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,110
    84,972
    Nov 30, 2006
    All due respect, but you're living in a glass house talking about poor analysis.

    "Speed and volume" means nothing. All that equates to is empty flash. Sizzle with no steak.

    Mayweather has fought lots of fast boxers, and lots of guys that have thrown volume at him. Just because Khan would combine those elements doesn't translate automatically into him stealing rounds. Judges will give Mayweather those same rounds he always edges on their cards for the same reasons they always do - BLATANTLY cleaner work and sharper punches.

    For such a fast guy, Khan is ridiculously sloppy. Not just tonight. Mayweather outclasses him easily.
     
  3. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    Khan was exposed tonight dude. He did the stanky leg multiple times and Algieri's left hook landed frequently. Mayweather is one of the best counterpunchers with the best timing. Khan could barely adjust to Algieri. Mayweather would mop the floor with him, I'm sorry.


    Also, hoping for Mayweather to look "old overnight" against Khan is making the same mistake when people thought he'd look "old overnight" against Pacquiao.

    Khan's chin is too glassy and Mayweather is too crafty.
     
  4. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    Sounds good to me:D:good
     
  5. FartWristedBum

    FartWristedBum I walk this Earth like a bum Full Member

    2,248
    601
    Feb 6, 2014
    Wind it in IB, NO stylistic advantage? what about the volume? He has exactly the same advantages that Pacquiao just had! Pac still took rounds based on VOLUME. Judges can't score every round for Floyd anymore, his work rate is too low. If you can't see that Khan is one of the men to AVOID in the division for Mayweather then I don't know what to say to you really, it's glaringly obvious to me.
     
  6. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,636
    16,329
    Jul 19, 2004
    And although I don't normally adhere to these types of parallels...

    Pac-Algieri is to Floyd-Pac
    as
    Khan-Algieri is to Floyd-Khan

    I think that logic illustrates the reality we see here.

    :smoke
     
  7. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,843
    6,364
    May 2, 2015
    No way in hell Khan would have any chance against Bradley, Thurman or Brook let alone Mayweather or Pacquiao. I'd say he should go back to 140 but can you imagine those shots landing from Matthyse or Provodnikov?
     
  8. Rumsfeld

    Rumsfeld Moderator Staff Member

    49,636
    16,329
    Jul 19, 2004
    Oh! Please do share whatever you're smoking. It most be whack!

    :smoke
     
  9. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,110
    84,972
    Nov 30, 2006
    :-(

    Before tonight, I was convinced Mayweather would outpoint Khan and maybe stop him with jolting lead rights on the jaw.

    Now, any kind of bet you want, based on their respective last form, Mayweather knocks his ass out. No two ways about it.
     
  10. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    Pacquiao wasn't a volume puncher against Mayweather. The only time he unleashed was when Mayweather was on the ropes which came far and few between. He pretty much tried to counter in the center of the ring and land flurries on the ropes. Thing is, Khan would never get close enough to Mayweather to unleash on him. Same as Pacquiao.

    Also, if Khan has the same advantages as Pacquiao...and Pacquiao lost...shouldn't that tell you something? :huh
     
  11. abuffy

    abuffy Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,653
    12
    Jan 10, 2015
    :happy:happy:happy:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup
     
  12. nervousxtian

    nervousxtian Trolljegeren Full Member

    14,051
    1,100
    Aug 6, 2005
    IB, I agree with that.. I still think it's the fight that sells best.

    Thurman, Bradley, Porter, Brook, Matthyse.. all better fights.. but Khan is the one that sells.

    I'm tired of Cotto.. a rematch isn't needed... and I don't need, nor want to see Floyd move up another real weight class.. he's not big enough.

    The Khan is a great swan song fight.. he'll get a KO over a "name" to end his career.
     
  13. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,110
    84,972
    Nov 30, 2006
    Yeah, if anything the story of the night was that Pacquiao kept himself "in the cage" and didn't unleash the volume he is usually known for. :? I certainly wouldn't call his volume against Mayweather 'advantageous' for him.

    Besides, volume alone means nothing. You have to be ACCURATE. Throwing a bunch of punches and hitting air or non-legal scoring areas doesn't get you any points. Zip. So even if Mayweather keeps a lot output and pot shots, if he's throwing six and landing four (and doing so with clean sharpness), while you go two for twenty, HE WINS.
     
  14. FartWristedBum

    FartWristedBum I walk this Earth like a bum Full Member

    2,248
    601
    Feb 6, 2014
    Answer me the very simple question: Why did a one dimensional, one-handed (and sub-par on the night) Pacquiao just take MULTIPLE ROUNDS off the 'immaculate' Mayweather then?

    I am in no way saying Floyd would let a potential Khan match up slip away from him and I would heavily favour Mayweather to start timing Khan and use his superior technique and timing to win by say 2-4 rounds but lets not go mad and suggest it would be more than that. Floyd ain't looking any better against Khan than he would fighting numerous other fighters in and around the weight class right now. Hence, he is going nowhere near Khan.
     
  15. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    403,110
    84,972
    Nov 30, 2006

    He took four, on my card.

    Those are four rounds Khan will never in his life take off Mayweather.

    There are levels in this.

    Mayweather >> Pacquiao >>>> Khan.