Here is a link with the press scores: [url]http://www.punditarena.com/boxing/jmurphy/press-scores-manny-pacquiao-vs-jeff-horn-tell-need-know/[/url] NOTE: Not all of these have scores, but I have tabulated the ones with actual scores, not just opinions of who won. Overall: 55 Pacquiao 7 Horn 5 Draw Actual Scorecards: 32 Pacquiao 4 Horn 4 Draw While these aren't official, I always look at the totality of the press scores to get a feel for who won the fight. I think these do speak volume.
Steven Bunce, 2 guys from Sherdog, Skip Bayless (weird), Paulie (obviously), Tom Gray, and Andrew Harrison.
Well I felt it was bad decision but not a robbery but this does speak volumes. Almost as bad as the 80 percent who had Kovalev winning the first Ward fight.
Alot of 115-113 scores to Manny there, which is exactly how I scored it. Manny still won the fight despite the two deliberate headbutts causing cuts and hitting on the break without penalties. Thats a true champion. The result should be changed to a NC and a rematch ordered this time on neutral ground.
The way I look at it is when a vast majority of people think a guy won, it was a robbery. I see a lot of people saying "well I had it 115-113 for Pacquiao, so it wasn't a robbery". Point being, if a fight is close but clear, it's still a robbery. I thought Ward-Kovalev was a robbery as well even though that was close. The reason I think it was a robbery is because I can't find 7 rounds to give Ward. Just my opinion, to each his own.
So you don't think the head-butt in the 6th round was just as much pacs fault as horns? You can see the video on youtube in slow motion and it looks pretty clear it was simultaneous. If anything pac was more at fault. 115-113 is a pretty close fight. Lots of people on this board think their scores are infallible.