Pretty Boy Floyd v Sweet Pea Whitaker

Thank you finally a legit arguement ... the "then some" solidified your arguement.

I countered by saying Floyd will adjust by bouncing and countering "Pea" can't force him to fight on the inside.

He did it against Castillo the second fight what makes you think he won't do it against "Pea"

Pernell was smooth but Floyd is good punching without having his feet planted and good at switching angles.

I expect to see a good counter to that instead of that bull**** you've been trying to feed me.

 

At the same time Floyd can just throw right hands which he has mastered over the years. In addition to the Floyd also has an underrated jab and with his length - he can come over the top of sweet pea's jab.

 

don't respond to what i write then ...

there's thousands of threads, just leave it alone if you're getting board. I'm just responding to what you write.

 

Yeah
He hit N'dou with 3 straight to end his night, he threw a weird 1/2 uppercut 1/2 hook type to make Chavez' corner stop the fight. He hit Ricky Hatton with it on a regular basis. He threw all right hands in the 5th round against DLH and made his knees buckle.
He can also throw it from the center, on the move, overhand, straight, counter, lead.

Oh and you forgot about his leaping left hook.

Now I never mentioned PBF winning but I disagreed when you made it seem like it would be an easy UD for Whitaker.

 

You seemed to be taking this thread a bit too serious. Why are you acting like I personally attacked you?

I was just trying to get a more detailed response out of you - saying that Pernell would just through his jab all night and do this and do that while not mentioning anything that PBF would do in response is weird to me. You might as well have said that PBF would get knocked out.
Pernell did lose before (despite any controversy) and the fact is that Floyd is still undefeated and on the top of his game.

Then when I mention some other demension that Floyd brings to the table you respond as if i'm an idiot or something.

Chill

Well I guess thats it for a legit debate w/ you...

Peace

 

Good point...

I was trying to come up with different scenarios but instead of people replying they argued.

 

In your eyes... the debate has been going on for hours and different people are giving their opinions.

Thats the thing both guys can adjust and both guys are smart... its tough to say that one has the upperhand on another just based on personal bias.
I can't argue with your opinion - I want to understand more.
I gave you my view, you came back with yours, then when I came with a different attack or scenario, you got mad - called me names - and questioned my knowledge of boxing, as if your opinion is more supreme than anyone elses.

You say that i'm dragging it on, but yet you still respond ??

We just talking boxing, I don't know you, you don't know me, just take the opinions for what they are and explain yourself or just quit the thread all together.