They are not on Fury's level Scott no power, too small for Tyson. Thompson, old, slow would get schooled Jennings small average Hw Wilder bum fighter, very crude skills. him vs Price is 50- 50 maybe slightly favour Price. Who ever lands first the other one is out
Steve Cunnighman was easily one of the fastest Heavyweights in the World. Tyson Fury cut off the ring, gave him no where to run and mugged him until a Ko. Tyson dominated the last couple rounds. Fury has great foot work and coordination. Fury is a great inside fighter and combination puncher for a 6'9 Heavyweight.
Problem is USS is not a true modern day HW at was already battle worn from his days at CW. He has 1 highlight reel KD in his career and that is against Fury. Not a good sign going forward.
What annoys me is people go oh he was only a 6'3 Heavyweight with an 82" reach. So what Fury beat him. Cunnighman was about the same size as Muhammed Ali, Larry Holmes two of the all time greats. Even Mike Tyson was only 212 lbs in his prime. Steve was bigger than Joe Louis, Joe Fraizer, Dempsey, Jack Johnson, etc, etc. If you want to measure a fighter by size.
Like i said, Steve does not have the size of a modern day HW. He was a career CW who scored a big KD on a big guy. Steve was never known for his power yet did what he did against Fury. Along with being dropped by Pajkic wobbled by Chisora 2 other guys who dont pack big punches, Tyson's chin is in question.
What im saying it is getting old people going oh a win doesn't count, it is no big deal becuase the fighter was only a 6'3 low 200 lbs HW with an 82 inch reach. He was only a small man. It was not fair that Fury was 255 lbs. But then in hypothetical matches the same exact fans go oh size doesn't matter at all, and pick 6'1 195 lbs 76 " reach Heavyweights like Joe Louis, Joe Fraizer to destroy modern Heavyweights like Lennox Lewis or Vitali Klitschko. Which is it size matters or doesn't? These fans like to have it both ways. Which ever suits their situation.