prime Corrie Sanders vs 2017 Wladimir Klitschko

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by MarkusFlorez99, Mar 16, 2024.


Who wins ?

This poll will close on Dec 11, 2026 at 10:36 AM.
  1. Corrie Sanders

    61.8%
  2. Wladimir Klitschko

    38.2%
  1. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    29,270
    15,092
    Dec 6, 2008
    Sanders beat Wlad so badly that it's hard to see Wlad winning. But Sanders wasn't all that. He lost to Rahman, who honestly seemed like a guy Sanders should beat on paper. Rahman weathered the storm and stopped him. Rahman was a good fighter, not saying otherwise. But I thought Corrie should have beaten him.
     
  2. Jon Saxon

    Jon Saxon Active Member Full Member

    1,447
    576
    Jun 1, 2011
    Sanders punches in the middle of Wlads defence from his southpaw stance everytime and is much faster than Wlad, he's all wrong for Wlad
     
  3. CooperKupp

    CooperKupp “B.. but they all playin NBA basketball again!” Full Member

    2,250
    4,761
    Aug 28, 2022
    Thing is… I do think prime Sanders is faster than Wlad 2017 and it’s not all that close. Now prime Wlad is a different story. Corrie does still have the hand speed advantage but not by as much as many think. Which is one reason I think 2007-2012 Wlad is a 50/50 fight against prime Corrie. Other reason is Wlad had a little faster feet imo.

    But 2017 Wlad…. Nah. Prime Corrie is bad news for him. Even if Wlad came in like he did against Joshua. The Corrie That blasted out Al Cole gets that Wlad out of there in 3-4 rounds imo. Even with Wlad being as motivated as he was.
     
  4. Jon Saxon

    Jon Saxon Active Member Full Member

    1,447
    576
    Jun 1, 2011
    No. it's all about the twitch muscle.
     
  5. TNSNO1878

    TNSNO1878 Active Member Full Member

    565
    1,053
    May 5, 2025
    Sanders could blow hot and cold, but when he was on his A-game, he was kryptonite for Wlad. If he fought a prime Wlad, I don't think he would blow him out of there in two rounds like he did in their actual fight, but I think he'd put Wlad down enough times to either win on points or by late stoppage. Wlad could jab and grab to a UD, but my money would always be on Corrie.

    Corrie was an exceptional talent with incredible natural ability. Wlad had to really work on sharpening his skills, and to his credit, he did, and he was effective, but Sanders was dynamite, one of my favourites to watch. Few fighters in HW history were as explosive as he was in the first three rounds, and he could've easily fit into any HW era and been dangerous.
     
    OddR likes this.
  6. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,131
    44,902
    Mar 3, 2019
    In this scenario, did 2017 Wlad lose to Sanders in 2003?

    If so, I pick him to win, if not he loses in the same way.
     
    OddR likes this.
  7. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,980
    19,021
    Oct 4, 2016
    Sanders is overrated by many in my opinion, his 3 best wins are over 2 gatekeepers Bert Cooper and Ross Purity and his upset of Wlad who's chin let him down when hit. heck Lamon Brewster ko'ed Wlad 2 fights after his loss to Sanders! Sanders losses? Ko'ed by Nate Tubbs, Rahman and Vitali . He has one other Ko loss but that was his last fight at 40. Don't get me wrong he wasn't bad and his power was a threat, but Wlad learned to control distance much better after those losses and if they'd fought again I think Wlad keeps him off this time, and I'm not a big Wlad fan but he had some abilities.