Prime EM vs. Prime PBF at 130.

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by scatterbrain, Jul 13, 2009.


  1. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    ey, peeps,

    enough of cotto and pac talk.

    i am a huge EM fan and just happy and sad at the same time seeing my favorite el terrible retired.

    i know he did his best work at the lower weights, 122/126.

    but assuming he fought his best at 130 at the same time that pbf was fighting at that weight, how do you think this fight would pan out.

    As much as a EM fan as i am, i can see this 50/50. if PBF stood his ground, i think EM can scrape out a SD or a close UD.

    if PBF chooses to fight in his usual manner, counter, hit hit, then move backwards, i can see him winning by a UD.

    EM had more snap and power in his younger days of course but his propensity to wage war outside of a tactical plan cost him battles. PBF has the speed advantage here but EM had that huge overhead right of his which has knocked out many opponents.

    please vote in my poll and provide reasons.
     
  2. Dan684

    Dan684 Dave's Stepdad Full Member

    17,612
    3
    Feb 19, 2009
    If they fought 10 times i'd pick Floyd to win 8 times.

    Too good a defense and he was a beast at that weight.
     
  3. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    PBF by KO. at 130 PBF had serious speed and Power. Em get beaten down in 8. no disrespect.
     
  4. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Floyd is better at everything than Morales and all his attributes are better.

    Agree with Tays. No disrespect to Morales but he gets beats down.
     
  5. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    true. but EM was a beast too at 122 and 126.

    both have 72 inch reach. PBF is 5'8 3/4. EM is around 1 inch shorter.

    practically the same in terms of physical attributes. I think EM would have been very competitive at 130 and 135 if he made the jump sooner instead of punishing his body by losing weight. with his frame and height, he could have fought comfortably at 135 in my opinion. but he had too many battles and was torn by the time he reached 135.
     
  6. boxbox

    boxbox Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,220
    0
    Feb 4, 2006
    PBF here...pull it down to 122 and i'll give it to EM
     
  7. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    i am not too sure about the KO bro.

    remember, EM was never KO prior to his loss to pac.

    i remember a similar thread to this before. both EM and PBF have almost identical KO ratios. about 73%-75%.

    and below 130, PBF did not have a 100% KO ratio which makes it illogical really for me to think that PBF will ko EM. that is why it was not part of the poll.
     
  8. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Well he never fought below 130 as a pro but at 130 his KO ratio was 68%
     
  9. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    I see another EM-Raheem fight here. PBF running around, stopping once in a while to potshot and goes back to cycling..

    PBF UD.
     
  10. dhenzrae

    dhenzrae A Proud Noypi Full Member

    7,856
    0
    Mar 8, 2008
    em is my favorite mex warrior but i can't see him winning this fight. 130 was not his stongest weight while pbf was a beast here. i'd say floyd by KO
     
  11. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    zDimensions matter not in this fight thing is spped kills and PBF was in attack mode alot at 130 he outsppeds Em and woudl make em look Washed up. Bad styles match for Em Not a style he would ever look good against. and PBF can take a shot at 130 EM KO ration came against smaller men PBF has stopped bigger ment then EM.
     
  12. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    my mistake. pbf only has a 64.1 KO % percentage. I just don't see PBF KO EM since PBF will stay the hell away from that EM right all night.
     
  13. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    :lol:

    Have you see Floyd fight at 130? He was far more active than he is today.
     
  14. tays001

    tays001 ESB ELITE SQUAD Full Member

    15,124
    7
    Mar 6, 2006
    have you ever seen PBF at 130? nothing like raheem and a million times better at everything
     
  15. eze

    eze Everybody Know Me Full Member

    45,885
    3
    Aug 7, 2004
    Why would Floyd stay away from EM at 130?

    He faced bigger punchers at 130, stayed in the pocket a lot more often, and traded.

    Have you seen any of his fights before 147? or did you just assum he fought the same then as he does now?