Prime Erik Morales vs Manny Pacquiao

The new and improved Pacman that beat a fat faded Morales RAHEEM also beat beat. Thats why Manny never getting credit.

 

Pacquiao best was after the first fight, but Morales best was before :think

I would say Morales, but if Pacquiao made the adjustments he made when he moved up to lightweight, I think it could well go either way. One thing is for sure-

It would be a war :bbb

 

that was at 132 catchweight and morales even failed to make weight. that shows how morales was uninterested and underprepared for that fight coming off a win over pac. and tell us which other fighter has stopped morales even until now?

 

Morales fought at heavyweight?

 

:hey

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8W-Iry0zu5M[/ame]

 

Morales wasn't prime anymore when they met no matter the age.

 

so now you're reduced to watching maestro's and karceno's videos?

 

:hey

 

It shows us Morales was struggling to make 130 anymore, which is why Roach insisted on the bigger financial overweight clause.

 

Poll speaks for itself.

 

This thread has become a ***** hideout.

Were else can they go really?

 

it's a known fact that morales didn't trained his ass for the raheem fight coming off a huge win over pac, just partying and going on holidays after the fight.

 

Outside of the Barrera fights, and maybe the McCullough fight, he didnt exactly have many wars.

He fough club fighters until almost his 30th fight.

He also mostly knocked out his opponents early, so theres no reason for their to be that much wear and tear on his body at 29.

Marquez has had jusy as many wars and hes still going at 39!

Some people just dont like the fact that Pacquiao beat his ass.

This idea that somewhere between March 2005 and January 2006 he suddenly lost his prime in bull****.

 

watch the video and list everything you disagree with :smooch

 

Well the glove excuse came up. I'm surprised the blood test and socks haven't. Lmao. Silly *******s.