Prime Frazier 1969-1971 vs Prime Foreman 1973

Frazier would not likely beat a prime Foreman, it would be very few fights out of 100.

But Frazier was past his prime in both meetings. ANd Foreman past his prime, more due to psychology, for the 2nd meeting. Manilla was a Thrilla, but BOTH fighters were past prime, though still so good, & part of the excitement & sadness is they could not evade blows well.

 

Your dedication to the task is admirable, but give it up already. You're out on a limb here with a bunch of 'what if's'...I'll stick to what I saw in real life.

 

So you're not willing to except that Frazier wasn't at his best against Foreman but you give Tyson a free ticket for getting destroyed by Douglas who wasn't even in Foreman's time zone!

 

The Douglas that faced Tyson would be a hard night's work for any heavyweight.I'd give him an excellent chance with Frazier who took 11 rds to beat a poor version of Douglas in Buster Mathis.

 

No 8.5lbs .

Ali weighed 10.5lbs heavier when he kod Foreman than he did when he kod Liston.Ali weighed 10.5lbs more when he lost to Norton than when he won the title from Liston.
Frazier gets murdered every time by Foreman.
Enough with the excuses,time to face reality.:deal

 

Frazier would have a field day with Douglas.

 

How come he was level on the scorecard of Arthur Mercante against Buster Mathis? Who was a much lesser version of Buster Douglas?

The Douglas that beat Tyson would give Frazier hell.


You are thinking with your emotions ,not your head.

 

The old war torn slob.Twenty nine years old and undefeated.:rofl

 

...You're obsessed with Tyson. Let it go, man.