Prime George Foreman vs Zhang

Go ahead. It will make a difference from you making things up.

That's a different argument. It's possible.

 

Fixed

Look at this dishonesty, you have ducked all my examples of smaller heavyweights hitting like SHWs. You have no actual argument other than Zhang is bigger. That's all it is

 

awaiting your quote

 

I quoted you right there u need glasses ? Your argument is Zhang is bigger, look at your own posts, that's your only point. Not that it matters Zhang Is a zombie in 6 he gets stopped

 

"You mentioned Zhang being bigger and therfor he hits harder because of physics"

Awaiting your quote of me saying this. Try again.

 

Oh so you weren't arguing that Zhang hits harder because he's bigger ? Oh okay what was this post alluding to ? With the physics, facts, and mentioning their size ? We're you just shitposting ?

 

I need you to quote me saying that Zhang hits harder only because he is bigger. That's what you said. Go fetch.

 

You have no other arguments, so why would i mention anything else. Can you list why Zhang hits harder other than his size ? Even if you're right Zhang is not the favorite

 

so ya don't have the quote, gotcha.

 

Everyone who mentioned you stole off on your argument than Zhang hits harder due to size/weight

You even say it here

you mention no other factor other than size as to why Zhang hits harder, unless im missing something. Please let me know why Zhang hits harder. You're trying to play stupid, but you don't need to play to stupid to show everyone the stupidity has always been there

 

try again. where is the quote?

I said "Excellent argument as to why Zhang's weight advantage over little George would be a decisive factor."

Weight advantage has a lot of dimensions other than just being able to "hit hard"

You are claiming something else.

You still don't have the quote.

Either find the quote or maybe read this again

This content is protected

 

You argue Zhang hits harder because of size here. What else were you alluding to ? Please let me know

You're acting stupid but everyone in this forum can see through you just rereading the entire thread. Please, stop trying to avoid a debate and actually argue for Zhang. Or don't say anything at all

 

still no quote.

you are a dishonest debater

 

What else is this post trying to get at ? Please if you think I'm wrong tell me what this post is trying to say, and correct me instead of avoiding

Most agree that you have no argument for Zhang outside of size, i certainly haven't seen anything. Reading the thread confirms it

 

You did not read the thread if you think that's the only argument that I have in Zhang's favour.