Prime Head 2 Head Calzaghe vs Hopkins...

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Machine, Jan 10, 2009.


  1. Cobbler

    Cobbler Shoemaker To The Stars Full Member

    19,216
    2
    Dec 10, 2005
    I agree with this. Six years ago I would give Hopkins a greater chance of winning, but also give Calzaghe a greater chance of winning by a bigger margin.
     
  2. David UK

    David UK Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    Feb 6, 2007

    Correct. Hopkins resume isn't better than Joe's, if wins/losses are taken into account, it's worse.

    Calzaghe would win, because he's proved that he ALWAYS FINDS A WAY TO WIN unlike Hopkins and Jones
     
  3. David UK

    David UK Boxing Addict banned

    5,986
    1
    Feb 6, 2007

    Good point. Hopkins had his chance when he was younger and he bottled it. Mind you, Hopkins has kept himself in such magnificent shape, I doubt he's deteriorated much since his prime.

    NB. Calzaghe's prime was about 6years ago when he fought Mitchell
     
  4. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    What in Hopkins persona gives you the impression he's the kind of man to "bottle it"?
     
  5. Killer Instinct

    Killer Instinct Be formless, shapeless... Full Member

    2,290
    0
    Sep 2, 2008
    My point was that B.hop's resume is far superior to J.C's. And since some one tried to devalue his wins over DLH and tito i brought the topic up.
     
  6. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    De La Hoya was an average win for Hopkins, good money spinner but dlh was never ever a middleweight!
     
  7. Killer Instinct

    Killer Instinct Be formless, shapeless... Full Member

    2,290
    0
    Sep 2, 2008
    Lacy and Kessler (still debatable) aside who has J.C fought? I could have compared alot of people on his resume.
     
  8. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    Neither were SRL, Hearns and Duran. Doesn't stop people holding them up as Hagler's best wins.
     
  9. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    yawn. This has been done to death.
     
  10. sugar_ray

    sugar_ray Guest

    the question should really be; would hopkins stop calzaghe?
    He possibly could. at 43 he knocked him down. at 33 he would probably knock him out.
     
  11. dan-b

    dan-b Boxing Junkie banned

    8,859
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    Indeed. As have the Calzaghe eulogies.
     
  12. Killer Instinct

    Killer Instinct Be formless, shapeless... Full Member

    2,290
    0
    Sep 2, 2008
    A zero these days in boxing means very little cus when he was Defending his Warren boxing organisation belt in Wales, in your own words, 'his prime was against Mitchall 6 years ago' that means he fought no one siginificant in his prime. no? And as the perfect oppportunist waited for his rivals to age. I actually believe Calzaghe's ring age is still very near his prime.
     
  13. Killer Instinct

    Killer Instinct Be formless, shapeless... Full Member

    2,290
    0
    Sep 2, 2008
    :good
     
  14. jc

    jc Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,971
    14
    Sep 9, 2004
    I dont hold Haglers win over Duran too highly either, though Duran was a MUCH better middleweight than DLH! DLH isnt in the same level of oponent as Hearns or SRL.
     
  15. Killer Instinct

    Killer Instinct Be formless, shapeless... Full Member

    2,290
    0
    Sep 2, 2008
    Don't get e wrong, im no Calzaghe hater at all, he is a very good fighter. And clkearly has accomplished alot. BUT i hate the way his legacy gets absolutely distorted.