Prime Holmes vs Tyson...

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Nemesis, Sep 3, 2007.


  1. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,075
    20,562
    Jul 30, 2014
    This is ridiculous. You're using a 38 years old washed up Holmes who hadn't fought in three years. You do that, you have to take a 38 year old version of Tyson as well. Are you willing to do that to? What's next, ⎌comparing Holmes as a kindergartener to a prime Tyson? :patsch
     
  2. mrkoolkevin

    mrkoolkevin Never wrestle with pigs or argue with fools Full Member

    18,440
    9,578
    Jan 30, 2014
    Yeah, I think people are reading too much into Holyfield's performance against an over the hill Tyson. Prime Holmes has more of the attributes that give prime Tyson trouble.
     
  3. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    52,835
    44,535
    Apr 27, 2005
    You forgot Ron Lyle :rofl
     
  4. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    148
    Dec 7, 2015
    MUCh BeTTEr
     
  5. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    WHAT does Holyfield do better than Holmes though? why should he be favored over prime tyson & not holmes?
     
  6. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    148
    Dec 7, 2015
    physically stronger Much bett,er jaw ,harder puncher,stylistically Worse for Tyson,MuCh beTTR inside Fighter
     
  7. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    148
    Dec 7, 2015
    U Fo r G o t ThE brain simpletOn
     
  8. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,075
    20,562
    Jul 30, 2014
    And Buster Douglas :yep
     
  9. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,075
    20,562
    Jul 30, 2014
    Yeah, I didn't get that at all. Fight Advantages:
    Hand Speed-Holmes, Boxing Ability-Holmes, KO Power-No Advantage, Chin-Holmes (though I could see an argument either way), Size-No Advantage, Defense-No Advantage, Endurance-Holmes, Adaptability-No Advantage, Foot Speed- Holmes, Strength-Holmes (Holy was a blown up cruiserweight), Jab-Holmes, Cuts-No Advantage, Reach-Holy(78) and Holmes(80) No Advantage, Body Attack-Holyfield
     
  10. foreman&dempsey

    foreman&dempsey Boxing Addict banned

    4,805
    148
    Dec 7, 2015
    th e biggest BunCh OF Biased sHI7 ever. get out of my view
     
  11. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,075
    20,562
    Jul 30, 2014
    Fill it in yourself then.
     
  12. dawnofthedead

    dawnofthedead Member Full Member

    353
    136
    Nov 13, 2014
    [Mike Tyson 86/88 would have defeated Holmes and Spinks even if they'd tag teamed. Peak Holmes was still vunerable as Shavers, Snipes and Witherspoon all had him in serious trouble. I could see Larry a little quicker and sharper than the 88' version which may allow the bout to last a little longer than their eventual match up but not too many rounds. Tyson would have gotten him by knockout around the halfway mark. Tyson KO6 Holmes. Remember Larry defeated Mercer several years later and pushed Holyfield close so for me Tyson would have defeated him regardless
     
  13. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    101
    Dec 26, 2009
    That has little to do with Holmes' condition vs tyson, he had a long layoff and wasn't in good shape compared to the versions that fought mccall holyfield and mercer.