@ 160 Who wins & why. Im leaning towards McCallum at this moment.Could change my mind in another hour.
this would be a chessmatch between two of the smartest fighters ever. i cant pick a winner in this one it could go either way.
I'd go Hopkins. It makes it to a decision, but Hopkins takes the fight to McCallum and comes out on top.
My scales tip in favour of McCallum. With his close combat ability he could match B-Hop punch for punch up close and box him ftom a distance. Tough fight to caal but i think SD fot McCallum
in my mind Hopkins fought the better competition in his career-more elite. He didn't lose to Kalambay in his prime like Mike did. I like Hopkins to win a decision in a great fight.
This would be absolutely brilliant to watch...for anyone who appreciated the technical brilliance of the Toney McCallum trilogy, this would certainly be on par. I would take Hopkin's to take the fight to (I know no one remembers an under 40 y/o Hopkin's) McCallum who would time and counter Hopkin's in a beautiful masterclass performance...I like Hopkins 8-4 or so, w/ no KD's or threat of a stoppage.
I think Hopkins proved in his prime that he was not going to lose. I think he was a little better than McCallum.