Prime Hopkins vs Prime Calzaghe

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by pngo, Apr 19, 2008.


  1. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest

    This is a tough one for me!

    Hopkins is not-prime but neither is JC and after this performance I can definitely see Calzaghe as a bigger challenge to a prime Hops than anyone(with the possible execption of RJJr)

    Might give Calzaghe the slight edge!
     
  2. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    I still think had that fight (Taylor-Hopkins) taken place at a higher weight, Hopkins would've beat him. Though Hopkins was 2 years younger, this was a better version that Calzaghe fought because he didn't have to worry about the weight drain. By the end of his middleweight reign, it was clearly making him a weaker fighter.
     
  3. Fedor Em

    Fedor Em Enforcement, VRWC style Full Member

    4,452
    4
    Dec 5, 2006
    Outstanding post:good
     
  4. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    But Joe is in his prime now, right? :roll:

    The double-standards on this forum are laughable.
     
  5. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    ............and Calzagne had 100 more "slaps" to his credit tonight! :good

    I don't believe Joe is in his prime anymore either, but his stamina has always been excellent & he can still outwork & outspeed any boxer.
     
  6. RUSKULL

    RUSKULL Loyal Member banned

    30,315
    8
    Dec 17, 2004
    Exactly. :cool:
     
  7. CarltonBlues

    CarltonBlues Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,516
    0
    Apr 5, 2007
    A young Hopkins would have kept up the clinic he was putting on early.
     
  8. KO Boxing

    KO Boxing Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,055
    4
    Apr 30, 2006
    And I said Joe was prime... Where?
     
  9. LiamE

    LiamE Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,391
    3
    Nov 3, 2007
    Hopkins didn't show his age, if anything Joe has slipped more in the last 6 months or so since Kessler.

    Joe would in prime for prime in much the same fight.
     
  10. The Kurgan

    The Kurgan Boxing Junkie banned

    8,445
    31
    Nov 16, 2004
    It's what you didn't say rather than what you said. You leapt in to point out that Hopkins isn't in his prime, but didn't make the same point in favour of Calzaghe.
     
  11. Spitbucket

    Spitbucket Guest


    What the hell are you talking about, Calzaghe is closer to 40 than Hopkins is to 50, they're both past their prime.

    "His stamina has been an issue for YEARS".............since when:patsch
     
  12. KO Boxing

    KO Boxing Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,055
    4
    Apr 30, 2006
    It was in response to other responses in this thread.

    I had already made my opinion clear on who I think would win, prime for prime.

    And yes, I do feel that Hopkins is more removed from his prime than Calzaghe... Perhaps not expierence-wise, but output wise. Which against Calzaghe, is his worst attribute.
     
  13. PATSYS

    PATSYS Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,481
    18
    Aug 12, 2004
    Prime Hopkins would be an easier fight for Calzaghe.

    Hopkins these days fights very ugly. But he has a convenient excuse to do so - his age.
     
  14. Rock0052

    Rock0052 Loyal Member Full Member

    34,221
    5,875
    Apr 30, 2006
    Must be referring to the Taylor fights when the weight draining was weakening him.
     
  15. KO Boxing

    KO Boxing Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,055
    4
    Apr 30, 2006
    Think a bit more before you let words out of your mouth (or onto your computer).

    Hopkins is 43. Add 7 years, he's 50. Minus 7 years, he's 36.

    SOOOOO...

    Hopkins is AS CLOSE to 50 as he is to Joe's OWN age, 36... Got it, numb nuts?