id be interested to see who would have won. and how would they have pair up stylistically does it make for a boring fight. and why did that fight not happen?
I believe Toney. But with Bernard you don't have to say 'prime', he has been at the top and fought the best for a far longer period than Toney. When people look back on their respective careers Hopkins will rank higher.
This is a good arguement .. Who fought better comp ? Toney's Biggest Wins McCallum Nunn Barkeley Jirov Holyfield Hopkin's Biggest Wins Trinidad Tarver Pavlik Wright Delahoya Pascal Let me know if I missed any?
Hopkins wins 8 times out of 10. James Toney was never a certain bet to turn up at his best. Hopkins was. Nard has always respected Boxing and shown up in shape, Toney hasn't. Hopkins wins a razor close decision, because he's more mobile IMO.
160 was Bhop's prime and 168 was Toney's prime imo. i probably can be easily swayed but I think Toney was at his best at 168lbs. At 160 I pick the Toney from the McCallum fight. I think Bhop's mouth would cause him to get very motivated.
I think Toney was at his best at 160. He had a much better balance between offense and defense at the weight. I think he beats Hopkins on points. Toney has shown he can hang with top guys like McCallum and Nunn, Bhop has never shown that ability.