Prime JC Chavez vs. Manny Pacquiao@130....who wins??

Those are pics of Pacquiao. You had nothing to do with them.

 

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA... Lance you can be a comedian

 

So I guess Hector Camacho,Meldrick Taylor,Edwin Rosario,Roger Mayweather,Tony Lopez,Jose luis Ramirez,Rocky Lodrigde,And Ruben Castillo were all bums right?Do you know that all those fighters were the best of the best in his divisions when he fought thwm and beat them?Rosario is a hall famer,Camacho will be and so might Ramirez and Lopez.Do you know that Chavez defended his 130 pound title a total of 10 times and his 140 title 13 times.How many times did Pac defend any titles?Just go to the 1988 light weight rankings in the link I provided and you will see that he fought all those top lightweights 6 out of ten ranked.And he dominated them not just beat them.Also if you check the close weights around like jr welterweight and also the following years you will see all the good top ten fighters he fought and beat.So he beat a lot of A+ and A fighters.

 

Why? You're way funnier then I am. At least, in a non-intentional fashion.

 

You can't talk about JCC's competition at 130 since Pacman hasn't beat anyone at 130. One top 10 fighter isn't very good. He isn't terminating P4P fighters. It will get turned against you.

i said pac didnt prove any thing yet at 130. next

Pacman hasn't beaten anyone on Chavez's level. So you can't use the argument that JCC never beat anyone on Pacman's level without having it thrown back in your face.

and do you think jcc faced anyone like pac at 130 :bart:bart:bart next




Here are the facts. BTW, you guys love to use Ring to make points. It will be used against you now.

You are talking about Chavez's competition at 130 being weak?

He beat Lockridge and Mayweather, both Ring champions at that weight with Lockridge being #4 and Mayweather being #3 when he beat them. He beat Martinez, the #3 fighter by Ring when Chavez beat him. He beat LaPorte who was #3 when Chavez beat him. These are not cab drivers....or does Ring rank them?

any NUMBER TWO POUND PER POUND ??? :bart:bart:bart NEXT

Now compare Pacman's resume at the same weight.

i said pac has nothing to do at 130 yet..... :good

You can't win this argument...

why??? pac is better than those jcc defeated at 130 :hi::hi:

 

i will give what is due.... COMMON SENSE bro If you can show pictures just like the one i did then you have the right to have the biggest mouth in this forum... but if you couldnt show any and you have the biggest mouth, then i believe that you are a pretender who knows nothing ... LOL :yep:yep:yep

so whose grade 3 now???? pwned :hey:hey

 

you are going above 130 mbandit.. pac has no business there. chavez would **** pac above 130.

 

Why does he **** him at 135, but LOSE at 130? This is just like the Duran thread moron. All you do is look at boxrec and try to find name you recognize. We all know your type johnny. You're not a boxing fan, and you have no sense of history. When Pac's done, you're done.

 

Like I said. You have nothing. When you do, let me know.

 

Pac fans are really annoying.

But why is it always KG vs. a random Pachead?

 

probably chavez by decision but would be a great fight

 

How is he a Pac hater? He hasn't said anything bad in regards to Pac. You calling him a hater just shows more that you're nothing but a little boy who thinks they know a thing or two about boxing. You don't know ****, and you are yet to display any knowledge or history of the sport. That, paqlaa (or however it's spelled) is a fact.

 

If I hated him I would tell you. My posting history shows that I argue for and against Pacman based on the subject. He is like any other fighter to me. You however only post about Pacman and PBF. For Pacman and against PBF.

You are an extremist like all your buddies. Plain and simple. And you can't keep a level head when arguing so you resort to this crap.