Prime Ken Norton v prime Mac Foster

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Legend X, Jun 4, 2017.


  1. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    Let's say Norton of 1973, against Foster from 3 years earlier.
     
  2. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,369
    12,703
    Mar 2, 2006
    That's a toughie. Norton was miles more talented than Foster, but Mac possessed Foreman-like power. It could have only taken one big one to have Ken doing a dance. If I was Ken's management I would have steered clear of this kind of a fight. And as a matter of fact, they did.
     
    Howitzer1888, timmers612 and Russell like this.
  3. Hookandjab

    Hookandjab Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,618
    552
    Feb 19, 2014
    Foster would have to come out looking for the kill right away. If he did, Foster in one.
     
  4. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,256
    15,314
    Jun 9, 2007
    I can see Foster taking this not only because of his power but Norton will probably be mentally beat going into this knowing hes facing such a heavy hitter. Once you had Norton beat mentally forget it.
     
  5. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,685
    2,560
    Oct 18, 2004
    Foster would kayo Norton in one round. Joe Frazier may have had reservations about fighting Mac Foster also.
     
  6. Legend X

    Legend X Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,315
    664
    Mar 18, 2005
    It seems like Mac Foster was really a beast.
    How come Quarry beat him ?
     
    swagdelfadeel, ForemanJab and Skins like this.
  7. scartissue

    scartissue Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,369
    12,703
    Mar 2, 2006
    A big banger always has a particular bane, and that is a counter-puncher with a good chin. Watch fights like Ali-Foreman, Starling-Honeyghan, both Sanchez-Lopez fights, Lujan-Zamora and you can see what I mean. This was Quarry's wheel-house. He thrived against Mac Foster, Ron Lyle and Earnie Shavers. All big bangers who were favored to beat him. Of course, with Quarry I'm talking about the clubbing style of puncher. A Joe Frazier buzz-saw style will beat Jerry 10 times out of 10. Speed always seemed to kill when it came to Jerry.
     
    Russell likes this.
  8. jowcol

    jowcol Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,333
    838
    Jul 22, 2004
    Mac packed a hard punch but his 24-0 with 24 KO's going into the Quarry scrap warrants an asterisk. He'd laid out over the hill 'greats' in that span and had never fought a top contender before Quarry and...after! He sort of reminds me of Cooney; cherry picking former contenders who were well past their prime. I could be wrong but I'll take Norton in this one pvp. The awkward Norton style would, at least, put a bit of a halter on Mac's power plus the only time he was in against top flight fighters he lost!
    But I have respect for Foster for this simple reason: He attended Jerry Quarry's funeral!!
     
  9. Curtis Lowe

    Curtis Lowe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,606
    1,076
    Feb 19, 2006
    If Foster lands the same big right on Norton that Mac landed on Quarry, it would be snooze time for Ken. Foster's problem was that he fought Quarry when Jerry was near his best. Which is kinda a tough break for Foster, as Quarry was maddeningly inconsistent.

    Would be an interesting fight, both the same size. I take Foster, the Foster prior to the Quarry fight, as Mac had not learned to lose yet.
     
    Hookandjab likes this.
  10. Saintpat

    Saintpat Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,349
    26,561
    Jun 26, 2009
    Very insightful post. It's an overgeneralization that every big puncher's bane is the same thing -- some are chinny, some were prone to cuts or had trouble with movers, some have had stamina issues, etc. -- but you nailed it on the head here and it's true for many punchers for sure.
     
  11. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,512
    3,109
    Feb 17, 2008
    I seem to recall there was some talk of this bout happening pre 1973. not sure why both these California based guys did not step into the ring with each other. i do not recall any talk of sparring together either. Kind of like Boone Kirkman back then, Foster had that big record alright but it was hardly against anyone better than a B grade fighter. Did pretty well against Ali that shocked a lot of folks.

    Norton had the superior corner & I think his conditioning and body work take the fight out of Mac halfway through the fight. If not earlier. And then it'd be awful tough for Foster to stay in the fight and not get stopped.

    It was so tough with boxing heavies back then because there were just a bunch of up and coming types that were strictly regional fighters. Guys would have nice records and so forth in that comfy pocket of theirs.
     
  12. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,685
    2,560
    Oct 18, 2004
  13. The Kentucky Cobra

    The Kentucky Cobra Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    3,576
    2,517
    Jan 9, 2017
    Defense

    https://streamable.com/6p982

    Foster wasn't that good, but he had the intangibles of elite power and durability that will always find a home in the heavyweight division.
     
    Legend X likes this.
  14. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,685
    2,560
    Oct 18, 2004
    And upset a guy like Joe Frazier, or possibly a young George Foreman.
     
  15. slender4

    slender4 Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,959
    2,031
    Apr 26, 2006
    Foster had a t-rex reach, and he really wasn't an infighter, he got his reputation beating washed-up guys like Williams, Spencer and Foley when they were up near 40.

    Ali and Quarry had no problem with him even though they struggled mightily with Norton and Frazier