Prime Ken Norton v the 8os Alphabet Soup

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Stevie G, Sep 26, 2011.


  1. Boxed Ears

    Boxed Ears this my daddy's account (RIP daddy) Full Member

    56,086
    10,493
    Jul 28, 2009
    I agree with all of this, Magoo. :good Without Holmes, there would simply be no long-reigning types likely in that era. None had the tools+consistency+dedication it would've taken, in combination and were at the right age.
     
  2. darling dame

    darling dame Active Member Full Member

    1,070
    3
    Dec 8, 2009
    great posts guys im gonna have to order a copy of norton-holmes two buddies who know boxing say norton won. i did have ken winning 3rd of ali trilogy. ken was great fighter i think he wasnt up for shavers
     
  3. FlyingFrenchman

    FlyingFrenchman Active Member Full Member

    954
    12
    Sep 15, 2011
    Well, he did fight Larry Holmes in 1978 and lost by SD. I think Holmes got a little better after the fight with Norton... but I think Norton was a little past prime when they did fight. Prime vs. Prime? Who knows? Holmes almost has to be favored but it's really a toss up.

    The other Champs-

    WBC-
    Witherspoon 1984
    Thomas 1984-1986
    Berbick 1986

    WBA-
    Tate 1979-1980
    Weaver 1980-1982
    Dokes 1982-1983
    Coetzee 1983-1984
    Page 1984-1985
    Tubbs 1985-1986
    Witherspoon 1986 (already mentioned above)
    Smith 1986-1987

    IBF-
    M. Spinks 1985-1987
    Tucker 1987

    I think he'd win some and lose some. He has the ability to beat them all but he'd have to fight to the best of his abilities and be in peak condition vs. a 100% Witherspoon, Dokes, Spinks, and even Thomas.
     
  4. FlyingFrenchman

    FlyingFrenchman Active Member Full Member

    954
    12
    Sep 15, 2011
    He did well in all 3 fights vs. Ali and his fight with Holmes. He had wins over Ali, Quarry, Young, and others. He was 137 when he fought Shavers and Cooney. He did as well vs. Foreman as Frazier did... which is pretty shltty... but that's Foreman!
     
  5. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,965
    68
    Aug 18, 2009
    Norton is really on par with the rest of the 80s titlists which is just 1 reason out of many 2 y i know for a fact that Ali is extremely overrated .
     
  6. ocelot

    ocelot Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,122
    13
    Nov 21, 2007
    Norton...Sooo underrated on ESB.
     
  7. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    i think witherspoon would give norton fits/
     
  8. FlyingFrenchman

    FlyingFrenchman Active Member Full Member

    954
    12
    Sep 15, 2011
    If he would have had a nice little title reign maybe people would respect him more? I do look beyond the actual stats... but you can't go too far beyond what is actually there.

    He went 0-3 in HW World Title Fights despite being the WBC HW Champ for a short period in 1978. Two of those loss were extremely close... L15 Ali in 1976 (rubber match) and LSD15 Holmes in 1978. The other World Title loss loss was a 2nd round KO to Foreman in 1974. Frazier doesn't get judged nearly as bad for suffering the same fate. Like Frazier, Norton also stopped Ron Stander and Jerry Quarry in 5. He also looked as good if not better vs. Ali in 3 fights.

    A case can be made that he should have went 4-0 vs. Ali x3 and Holmes even though he actually went 1-3.

    Here's what a lot of people look at...

    Jimmy Young drew with Shavers in their rematch in '74 (many felt Young won), he beat Lyle in '75, lost a questionable decision to Ali in '75 for the HW World Title, he beat Lyle again in '76, and beat Foreman in '77. Young was considered the best HW in the world by a lot of people in 1977. In late 1977 Norton and Young fought for a WBC HW Title shot... Norton won by SD.

    All of the good things Norton had been doing since mid '74 combined with all of the good things Young had been doing during that same period was very impressive. The winner of their fight was considered the best HW in the world by many in late 1977. The fight was very close but Norton did just a little bit more and got the decision.

    Next up was Larry Holmes.
     
  9. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,131
    8,582
    Jul 17, 2009
    For a long time,I thought that Norton was born in 1945. In recent times,it's come out that he was indeed born in 1943. So,that makes Ken two months shy of 35 years of age when he fought Holmes. Yes,Holmes improved a bit after their fight,and he also had an arm injury when they fought,but Ken was past his best,albeit still formidable. Taking Holmes and Norton on a prime for prime scenario,I believe that we'd have a trilogy with one of them winning it on a two out of three basis.
     
  10. Titan1

    Titan1 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,685
    2,561
    Oct 18, 2004
    Norton beats all of them, though if he catches Page on the right day, Page takes him out late.