Prime Larry Holmes vs Evander Holyfield

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sas6789, Jul 3, 2017.


Prime Larry Holmes vs Evander Holyfield

  1. Holmes By PTS

    83.2%
  2. Holmes By KO/TKO

    4.2%
  3. Draw

    2.1%
  4. Holyfield By PTS

    8.4%
  5. Holyfield By KO/TKO

    2.1%
  1. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    17,154
    16,920
    Jun 9, 2007
    I always had Bowe winning the second fight by a round
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  2. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,832
    10,036
    Jul 15, 2008
    Larry beats him pretty easy .. if you watch their actual fight Holmes looked very good for the first few rounds and he was forty two plus ... Evander was a warrior but I find him to be a tougher fight for the punchers then the top boxers .. Holmes and Ali would have outpointed him cleanly .. I don't know anyone who knocks him out in his prime as two of the all time best, Lewis and Tyson couldn't .. maybe a Joe Louis ...
     
  3. Birmingham

    Birmingham Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    9,075
    6,791
    Jan 13, 2017
    Agreed. Just because fighters are past prime it doesn’t mean they would be less effective against certain fighters or styles than prime. Like you say, Norton pushed Holmes very close when he was prime and Norton as good as he was would be seen as a shade beneath Holy prime h2h imo...Holmes was a cagey crafty still capable atg using everything in his arsenal against Holy. Them fighters always have good fights left in them or can make it very difficult just on craftiness alone against less experienced fighters coming up. I think your right, maybe a series involved here
     
    Bummy Davis likes this.
  4. KuRuPT

    KuRuPT Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,464
    2,823
    Aug 26, 2011
    Don't think this will be as easy of a fight for Holmes as many here do. Holmes was pushed by guys inferior to Holyfield, thus Holyfield could certainly beat him.
     
  5. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,832
    10,036
    Jul 15, 2008
    It certainly doesn't mea
    It certainly doesn't mean they are better ..
     
  6. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    17,154
    16,920
    Jun 9, 2007
    Can't the same be said about Holy too?
     
    Rumsfeld likes this.
  7. Wass1985

    Wass1985 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,436
    2,839
    Feb 18, 2012
    Take it you didn't read my opinion, young Holmes fought nothing like the one that faced Holyfield.
     
    robert ungurean likes this.
  8. heizenberg

    heizenberg Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,981
    285
    Nov 6, 2013
    Holmes gave Holyfield in his prime a real good fight when he was well passed his prime. Holmes in his prime I think wins handily, I still would look for Evander to make a good fight of it and I think he goes the distance. Holyfield was is an excellent boxer and tough to finish I think he'd give Holmes a tough fight like Ken Norton but would lose clearly. Holmes jab would be what would make a big difference I think it would off set Evander and I think Holmes would at times knock Evander around the ring and hammer him.
     
  9. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,137
    5,764
    Feb 26, 2009
    maybe so but he was the smaller guy who had to work harder to win... Bowe had all the advantages in those fights.
     
  10. Grapefruit

    Grapefruit Active Member Full Member

    1,215
    944
    Dec 19, 2017
    Interesting match up, we all know how evander did against old man Holmes, but if they fought while Holmes was in his prime form I suspect that Holmes out points evander, both had chins of steel and not enough firepower to knock each other out, so it' definitely going to the judges who would give it to Holmes based on how many times Holmes landed that killer jab.
     
  11. Man_Machine

    Man_Machine Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,954
    10,414
    Jun 9, 2010
    Holyfield beat a very old Holmes (I think Holmes was in his early forties by then). His workrate was the overwhelming factor, against a very slowed up and, at times, static opponent. Even then, Holmes had his moments and was making a bit of fun out of the 'Real Deal'.

    In this fight, Holmes demonstrated how his younger self would have beaten Holyfield relatively comfortably. A prime Holmes would have had more in his legs to keep up a sustained movement, fight off the back foot and take the sting out of Holyfield's forward motion; take less punishment and counter more effectively. Even if caught, old Holmes proved he was able to take Holyfield's power.

    Holyfield's workrate (and fair bit of body punching if I recall) won him the fight but he was getting hit easily by Holmes, who's only real handicap was having to pace himself and curb his activity, to manage his age and the heat. A prime Holmes would have left much of Holyfield's workrate hitting air, whilst he countered Holyfield all night long towards winning a comfortable UD.
     
  12. timmers612

    timmers612 Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,018
    417
    Sep 25, 2005
    Lar takes this one, he was one of the greats I think we all agree and for me a few notches ahead of Evander. At his best Holmes had as good a balance and command of his punches and timing as any heavyweight champion.
     
  13. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,141
    Nov 19, 2016
    Of course . certain idiot said that holyfield was not in the same league of holmes
     
  14. Combatesdeboxeo_

    Combatesdeboxeo_ Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,991
    1,141
    Nov 19, 2016
    If they fought 3 times holyfield would win 1 close fight and holmes would win 2 close fights
     
  15. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    17,154
    16,920
    Jun 9, 2007
    Holmes wins all 3 some people don't study prime Holmes enough
     
    Man_Machine likes this.