Prime Lennox Lewis vs Prime Larry Holmes

Ive watched Wlad since the 90's he CLEARLY was using more lead punches covering them up as well as more head movement and feints and showed the best footwork byFAr ive seen him fight in. You WOULDNT see this stuff. Even his own brother said he gave his best performance and thats what you do when faced with aother guy of equal talent...again you WOULDNT know this you have limited capacity it seems?

Now if he had ALL these problems going in against Joshua why did you bet Wlad??? Its on your bet slip in the betting section isnt it???? See how dumb you are ,you were going to say Joshua was overatted bc he lost toa 41 year old when in fact hes done something in 18 fights no one has ever done and thats beat a elite SHW with skills and can PUNCH who has only dropped 3/4 fights in 60 something ones.

Pulev has a better jab than joshua tells me everything you actually know....keep obsessing bc he like i are going to be around here awhile kicking you around this forum when it calls for it ...something i suspect will be often?

 

I've seen every single one of Wlad's fights. He CLEARLY was using the same feintings against Fury too, but Fury was out feinting him with quicker reflexes. The only reason he looked more elusive against Joshua was because he was up against a stationary target like I said but you were obviously too idiotic to understand that. His brother meant that It was the most exciting fight of his, It was a translation error.

I didn't bet Wlad. I picked AJ to KO him. But there was nothing special about it, he like Tyson, Holmes, Ali, Marciano, beat an aging inactive champion with his struggles being the only difference. See for yourself:

https://www.boxingforum24.com/threads/the-official-a-joshua-vs-w-klitschko-prediction-thread.585023/

Like I said, I've been high on Joshua for a few years. But that doesn't mean I think he's invincible. You can be high on a fighter and still see the flaws in his game unless you're an idiotic casual fanboy which is exactly what you are.

He's better than Pulev at every aspect of the game, except for jab. You wouldn't know that because you're just an idiotic casual fanboy. I'll enjoy Joshua's fights in the future as I've in the last several years and continue to own and trash you in the meantime.

And, I'm sorry, you talk about betting section? With your 700 something vcash against my 47000? That's just way too moronic, even for a simpleton like you.

 

Wlad was unbelievably motivated in this fight , more than he ever was before because he knew he had to be
in the shape of his life to have a chance against Anthony Joshua, he trained his arse off.

AJ outboxed Wlad in the first 4 rounds and he was to careless in the 5th ( after he knocked him down ) and in
the 6th round because of his inexperience.

He got hit with a big right hand in the 6th round but it was not like he was nearly knocked out, he was quick
on his feet after the knockdown.

He recovered for the next 2 rounds which was actually very smart from him and he won the fight in the 11th round
by beatdown, i think saying that he went life and death with Wlad is a little bit far fetched.

 

I saw you picked Wlad in the mock betting so you can lie all you like.

Pulevs jab is not nearly as fast or concussive as Joshuas.

you can hate all you like too...bc joshua will go undefeatted for at least 5 more years,that must irritate you ? lol

I bet MMa too..and put the wrong number at one time ..so theres that....my predictions speak fopr themselves anytime you want to doa ban bet with me please let me know?

 

Agree with most of your post, except:

Wlad was always focused, always trained hard and came in %100 prepared. Yes, Fury's style was hard to be %100 prepared for, but that had more to do with Fury's style than anything else. If he makes a come back and gets in shape, he'll be very hard for anyone to look good against, win or lose.

And I don't think I ever said he went life and death with him. He had struggles, but not life and death struggles. I also thought he recovered very well.

 

Sometimes you can go against the guy you're favouring to win if the odds are wide enough, especially you have around 50000 vcash like me. A broke simpleton like you wouldn't understand that. And I ain't buying your excuse, you're just too dumb to bet.

Joshua's jab is faster, but Pulev's is sharper and has more leverage. I have seen him score KDs with it, you obviously haven't because YDKSAB.

And like I said, Joshua's reign won't irritate me one bit. I was following him im his amateur days back when you'd never heard of him in your life.

Your predictions speak for ****. I'm #4 in forum's prediction league, I'm the one who called the most upsets so far and still have a high ranking despite going for the underdog for the most of the time. Feel free to join in anytime.

You can't **** with me b1tch. You ain't man enough.

 

Fair enough if you fancy holmes,i wouldnt myself but easily ?
He went life and death with norton and shavers who wouldnt get near lewis and he was outboxed by spinks,albeit late in his career.holmes was smaller less power,with a good jab and chin but to say lewis would be easy is ludicrous

 

Yea your the imbecile who said Usyk would defeat most Hw's correct...you are number 4??lmao...well let me know for a perm ban bet when Usyk fights the top guys at Hw...cant wait for that ....

as far as my predictions havent got one wrong but one with Huck as far as boxers i know some were actual guesses..you still LOSt that Wlad bet bc we both know you are a troll who likes some fighters for obvious reasons.... ..and when i BREAK them down i obviously kknow what im talking about ...Bytch please????tell me again how Holmes is favored over Lewis ,IDIOT!!!!!lmao

 

Coming from the simpleton who claimed taller fighters' punches would have more effect because of gravity, I'll gladly take a bet with you about a fight with Usyk.

As far as predictions, you've only got one wrong because you only make a prediction when you're %100 certain of the outcome. You're not man enough stick your neck and call the result of a fight when It's not crystal clear. And I showed you a prediction thread where I picked AJ by KO, go check out Kirk's leauge(where I'm close to top despite going for the underdog most of the time, something that you'd never come close to accomplish in your life) where I also picked AJ by KO, go check Rummy's thread where I also picked Joshua by KO. You're just too moronic to understand of the concept of betting(hence your lame vcash), you don't neccesarily bet for who you think will win, you bet for the most profitable outcome with risk/reward equation(and since It's just betting for fun, there's no risk whatsoever). By the way, I called Briedis UD Huck from the day the fight announced.

When you break down a fight, you don't know ****. You decide who you want to win, then try to break it down accordingly(hence the moronic arguments like "whoever wins in a sprint race has the better footwork). You're just a casual fanboy who falls in love with the hype, with KO power and with the look of fighters. I however lşke and support fighters from all styles, from all around the world.

And I never said Holmes would be favoured over Lewis. But that's what morons like you do, you start to lie and pull things out of your ass when you realize you're completely owned.

 

I saw Holmes get dropped by the hardest puncher in Heavyweight history Ernie Shavers and he got up and kicked his ass. I saw Lewis knocked out twice by much less punchers. Lewis ain't knocking Larry out, Larry by UD

 

Funny he got up against the hardest punching heavyweight in history but tyson who i presume isnt knocked him out.
Then the likes of wlad and lewis who dwarf him and have 40lbs on him dont compare either ?
He hit hard in the 70's move on

 

Idiot, Holmes was a Grandpa when he got laid out by Tyson...........while Lewis got waxed twice by one punch by genuine borderline journey man and WK took 4 times a nap against a trail horse, a Golfer, a face first punch bag and a green horn................as far as size, lol, you have never seen Larry Holmes if you call him short, as a matter of fact the above fighters who finished Lemmie/WK are of similar statue of Holmes with far inferior skills.

When Lemmie faced a threat he was very cautious because he knew his achilles heel is his chin especially against right hands which Larry had a very good one behind one of the best jabs in history............I could see Lewis possible get a decision in 12 but in a 15 rounder Holmes will prevail, no doubt.

 

Did he punch harder than briggs,grant,tua,ruddock,tyson,morrison,bruno and so on would you say ?
Its you who is the idiot,lewis got starched twice,yes,anyone who gets hit bang on the button by a haymaker will,i think he earned his stripes after it happened to say he wasnt chinny,watch vitali or briggs fights for example.
Ive got no agenda to slag holmes off,i like him as a fighter,tough as they come and good skills to go with it.
Did he beat many top names ? No
Was it his fault ? Not really but to make out he definately beats lewis in any capacity is bull****

 

Ye,it was a trademark with lewis when ever he fought a puncher he nacked away from danger,its especially noticable in the ruddock,grant,briggs and golota fights,it was his mobility and ring smarts and fear that gave him the edge

 

Holmes but it would have been very interesting while it lasted. Lewis struggled with fighters who could jab with him...Bruno, Mercer, Rahman and Klitschko although i suspect he would have given Holmes all the trouble he could handle but i give Larry the nod by late round stoppage after being decked and repeatedly stunned himself. Holmes TKO13 Lewis.