Lennox Lewis was a notch above Larry Holmes as an all around fighter, he could do it all. Lennox Lewis would win by UD or late KO.
What the **** are you talking about? First, galvatmoron didn't own anything in his life. Second, he didn't say anything about how AJ/Holmes would go.
Oh, so you admit that you don't know **** about boxing so you need a fellow Joshua d1ck rider to break down the fights for you? Good to know. And I can't be bothered to ask him right know, spanking his ass got boring a long time ago.
You simpleton...let me break that down for you then... Joshua showed he could stay with ANY jabber...because hes actually the first one to match Wlad jab for jab,though wlad still the best jabber....Holmes NEEDS the jab,without it he CANT win. joshua doesnt NEED the jab and showed that last week,he would simply do a bigger version of Tyson on Holmes and probably knock him out sooner if he goes for an early k.o. Style wise its EASY pickings for Joshua. no matter how decided to approach that fight and bc ONLY BIg punchers will defeat him! Lewis would struggle more bc hes a more cautious work behind the jab fighter,setting up his over hand right that's easier to see coming than how Joshua sets up his punches and with more speed on them. Are you sure you dont have posters of Joshua on your wall?Maybe a dart board you seem a bit obsessed since i PROVED beyond a doubt why Ali would lose to him in all likleyhood how much $$ did you lose on Wlad ? See when you open your eyes you would sound like you know what you are talking about too.....
You should watch the 7ft. elephant in the ring thread about an interesting matchup between AJ and Valuev, hilarious.
ahh yes Doublejab666 the poor mans version of Kiwiman ( hes actually o.k) ...nah i'll avoid garbage like the plague on here when possible unless im BORED.
You moron... let me own your ass once again then... Joshua shwed that he could stay with an old jabber who's jab was the shell of what it was once. He wasn't the first one to match Wlad jab for jab, Pulev was getting the better of him in most exchanges(you just exposed yoursef an ignorant casual fan again by proving you've never seen that fight), even rocked him with his jab once which was the main reason Wlad started to lead with his left hook. One thing we learnt about AJ is that Pulev's jab is superior to his, there's no way he'd be able to negate the jab of the greatest jabber in the HW history. Yes, Holmes needed the jab, which would be on Joshua's face all night. Holmes would frustrate AJ from angles with his far superior footwork, bust his face up with tripled jabs and 1-2s and win a clear decision. To claim It'd go like Holmes/Tyson proves what a moron who DKSAB you are once again. Tyson had far, far superior upperbody movement to AJ, was far better at cutting of the ring, and had the better, sharper and quicker combinations with better and harder body shots. I like Joshua, I think and have thought for a year or two that he's the heir apparent. But he has visible limitations. And you didn't prove **** about Ali In fact, you've been schooled, owned and trashed so bad in that thread that you went full ret@rded and started bullshitting about gravity, velocity and how a sprint race would determine which fighter has the better footwork. But really, why don't you tell us more about how AJ has better footwork than Holmes because he'd beat him in a sprint race and how Holmes couldn't deal with his punches because of gravity? You utter moron.
An old jabber who gave his best performance thus far bc he HAD too ,to remotly have a chance to win.Holmes fought until 50 you imbecile and still maintained the same snap in his jab. no one is contesting Wlad lost some speed ,no one is also saying (only morons like you) that Joshua in 18 fights under him proved just how dangerous he is and fought Wlads fight most of the time and still won. Pulevs jab is not better than joshuas. you are clearly an imbecile troll used to being right,unfortunaly im on this site now and will tell you you dont know much...you didnt even know what lateral footwork was until i explained it to you in detail? sorry but you are simply stupid the rest garbage you posted is just that..so how much $$$ did you take a hit on your Wlad loss? That seems to be bothering you and why you post pointless rants as well..!
His best performance my ass. Only a mentally ill d1ck rider like you would argue a 41 year old fighter who's been out of the ring for 17 months could possibly be in his prime. Wlad fas faster, had more accurate punches and quicker reflexes against Jennigs and Fury. If anything, he had ring rust against AJ, It took him 4 rds to shake it off and find his rhythm. The only reason he looked better against AJ was because he was against a stationary target who had no head movement. I know that Holmes fought until 50 you spastic, but only a simpleton with half a brain cell like you would argue he was as sharp as he was in his youth. And I never said AJ has proved how dangerous he is yet. I realize he may yet improve. You're just talking out of your ass right now. And yes, Pulev has a better jab than him as of yet as proven by Wlad. You are moron who keeps digging holes for himself with beyond idiotic arguments and tries to save face by swinging for the fences like a ****** after getting owned over and over again which is why you tried to tell everyone how Joshua has the best footwork because he'd win in a sprint race and tall fighters' punches would have more effect because of gravity and exposed the ret@rd you are.
'LL either early ko1/2 or ud after hurting him 3,4 x. Scores will be very close cuz Holmes will go through stretches out boxing him. I feel LL hurts him early and even surviving LL scores a kd, that could be the difference. 'LL sometimes would come out in 1 and 2 looking to take heads off, always possible