Prime Michael Spinks vs Evander Holyfield @ HW

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by tommygun711, Apr 4, 2016.


  1. Addie

    Addie MAB. Full Member

    42,285
    22
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jun 14, 2006
    Hello Clinton.

    At least someone has remembered me. :good
     
  2. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    49,472
    7,885
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Nov 24, 2005
    Heavyweight Holyfield would beat Spinks up.
    It would last maybe 7 rounds.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    49,472
    7,885
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Nov 24, 2005
    Spinks is rated just right.
    He did well to nick a decision against Holmes, was very lucky to get the decision in the rematch, was steered clear of all the decent young heavyweight contenders, the top 10 guys, and eventually they took the Tyson fight because the money was too big to turn down.

    Spinks was a tricky customer, but the Holmes he barely beat was no puncher and no young energetic pressure fighter. He wasn't a "killer" heavyweight, he was a past prime champion who was coming off a very disputable decision win over Carl Williams.

    With only 5 heavyweight fights in total, 4-1 with one of those wins being hotly disputed, it's hard to rate Spinks higher.

    A great victory for Spinks, a historical win. But his ONLY meaningful win at HW.

    Holyfield's win over Holmes (who had just eliminated Mercer from the title shot, to be fair) is just a standard one on Holyfield's resume and not a particularly impressive one.

    Michael Spinks would do better against a lot of great heavyweights than he did against Tyson, especially the Spinks of 1985 who was a bit more mobile still.
     
  4. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    38,956
    856
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 3, 2007
    Holyfield should be favored. But I think the Spinks of the first Holmes fight, if he boxes intelligently, could make an evening out of it and maybe even score an upset. Michael was quick and awkward.. Certainly a better technician than the vast majority of Holyfield's actual opponents and was capable of going 15 rounds. I don't see this as being the mismatch that most others deem it as.. But again, this is the 1985 version of Spinks I'm talking about. Not the one who fought Tyson in 1988.
     
  5. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,259
    1,344
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 22, 2009
    Cheers:good. You're an excellent poster! Even when I disagreed with you, you always said something interesting and intelligent. Glad you're back:good
     
  6. Bonecrusher

    Bonecrusher Lineal Champion Full Member

    3,044
    345
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jul 19, 2004
    My thoughts exactly.
     
  7. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,450
    2,468
    Sportsbook:
    100
    Oct 4, 2016
    I don't know if Spinks could beat Evander, but I honestly think he's twice the boxer that Holyfield is, just don't know if he could control ranges and the tempo of the fight, if he does he takes a UD, especially in a 12 rounder.
     
  8. elmaldito

    elmaldito Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,272
    1,703
    Sportsbook:
    79
    Jun 11, 2009
    At light heavy I’d take spinks
     
  9. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft The Cincinnati Cobra Full Member

    6,830
    6,668
    Sportsbook:
    1,022
    Mar 3, 2019
    He beat an undefeated Holmes once, it's litterally impossible to do it more than once
     
    Jackstraw likes this.
  10. THE BLADE 2

    THE BLADE 2 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,803
    994
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jul 14, 2009
    Holyfield by close decision
     
  11. mark ant

    mark ant Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,387
    4,350
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    May 4, 2017
    Holyfield was a better counter puncher and harder to hit with hooks, he rode shots better than Spinks also, he could take Spinks punches far better than Spinks would have taken his, I don`t know if Spinks chin was any better than Moorer`s.
     
  12. mark ant

    mark ant Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,387
    4,350
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    May 4, 2017
    Holmes was a lot slower by `85, that version of Larry wouldn`t have fought as well as Holy did in his rematch with Bowe.
     
  13. mark ant

    mark ant Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,387
    4,350
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    May 4, 2017
    At cruiser I`d take Holy, a catchweight match would be more interesting.
     
  14. Arminius1

    Arminius1 Member Full Member

    143
    108
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jun 7, 2019
    Holyfield would have destroyed Spinks. He was too strong for him.
     
  15. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,516
    2,390
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Sep 21, 2017
    Holyfield prevails in a tough fight.
     


Sign up for ESPN+ and Stream Live Sports! Advertisement