Prime Mike Tyson vs 70's George Foreman

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by FelixTrinidad, Jul 1, 2012.


  1. fistsof steel

    fistsof steel Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,196
    3,057
    Nov 13, 2010
    George was an absolute Monster was only TKOd once in a long career and that was by a legend in Ali,Tyson liked to finish his fights early and did not like being taken to later rounds,George knocks him out in 8 just to powerfull.!!!!
     
  2. DOM5153

    DOM5153 They Cannot Run Forever Full Member

    12,340
    1
    Jan 9, 2009
    Prime Tyson would be far to mobile for Foreman, people need to take off the rose tinted glasses.
     
  3. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Wonder why this really never happen ..Foreman was very dangerous at the time ..Tyson was also far removed from Cus by then..
     
  4. pmfan

    pmfan Active Member Full Member

    1,408
    2
    May 11, 2008

    Funny how Tyson supporters say you cannot include the Douglass fight in Tyson's "prime". Gee, he was what, 23 at that time? No all time great athelete has ever been washed up at 23, barring catastrophic injury. If Tyson was really what Tyson's supporters think he was, he couldn't have been so diminished by the age of 23. True boxing talents don't forget how to be great at 23; they are just on the rise towards mastery.

    The result of the Douglass fight would have happened even with Rooney on board.
     
  5. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    This
     
  6. Imperial1

    Imperial1 VIP Member Full Member

    54,515
    121
    Jan 3, 2007
    Have to disagree if Rooney were on board for the Douglas fight.He would have been much better prepared for the likes of Douglas .
     
  7. fistsof steel

    fistsof steel Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,196
    3,057
    Nov 13, 2010
    And Foreman won a World Title at 46 years of age and went the distance with a prime Holeyfield when he was 42 Big George in his prime defeats Tyson.!!!!
     
  8. PanchoVilla

    PanchoVilla Guest

    I think prime Mike Tyson was just too dam fast and that would eventually be the difference in this match..
     
  9. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    All I'm sure of is that it would be one hell of a fight.
     
  10. gr33nfather

    gr33nfather Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,188
    4
    Sep 27, 2008
    please, Frazier's chin and balance was ****, Tyson takes Foreman's best shot and attacks with thunderous combos... Larry Holmes is better than Foreman and look what Tyson did to him... Holmes was still a heavyweight contender, after the Tyson fight he went like 23-3 so its all bull**** saying Holmes was at the end of his career Tyson kicked his ass, it's surprising Holmes is still alive
     
  11. FelixTrinidad

    FelixTrinidad Boxing Addict banned

    4,735
    2
    Jun 15, 2012
    How tall was Foreman?

    6'4?
     
  12. dyna

    dyna Boxing Junkie banned

    8,710
    27
    Jun 1, 2012
    Larry Holmes was practically shot.

    Winning as 52 year old against Butterbean isn't a big feat unless you're a brawler or an inside fighter.
     
  13. gr33nfather

    gr33nfather Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,188
    4
    Sep 27, 2008
    Prime Foreman, 6'3 225-230, not big enough for Mike
     
  14. gr33nfather

    gr33nfather Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,188
    4
    Sep 27, 2008
    Butterbean was his last fight... He went 21 wins -2 losses after the Tyson fight and he beat up undefeated Ray Mercer.. he wasn't shot at all for the Tyson fight, stop hiding the facts
     
  15. SA Boxing fan

    SA Boxing fan Member Full Member

    398
    1
    Sep 1, 2011
    this could go either way imo. As hard as Tyson hit, he wouldn't KO George. If it went the distance, Tyson on points. But George also has a chance to KO Tyson. The difference in chins might be the difference between winning and losing.