Prime Mike Tyson vs Prime Wlad Klitschko

Not sure about this one.....

 

Just voted for Mike however however I would not put a wager on it....

 

Shut up you filthy jock-strap.

What does your kind say when Wlad lost to Purrty by TKO?? He was young, he was this , he was that..:tired:roll:

Well, when Tyson met Tillis , he wasn't a pro as long as Wlad was , had less fights and was a year or two younger and he BEAT Tillis.:roflatsch

So if Wlad is getting KNOCKED OUT by Journeyman Purrity and Tyson BEAT Tillis , you answered Mike being the probable victor and were too stupid to realize it.

 

You have man love for Clinchko. :blurp

A love for a man and not this sport. You've ousted yourself now ya Batty's boy.

 

Do you Dino have any love for the sport? Or just hatred against Wlad?

 

too much 4 you, aye.

 

smith n tucker were titlists.

yet for you to fit your facts, you have to pretend they are stiffs.

 

I think Wlad would have been terrified of Rooney trained Tyson and would have played the tag team card and put his brother in.

Wlad wouldn`t have had the ***** to get in the ring with genuine prime Tyson.

 

I think Wlad would have been terrified of Rooney trained Tyson and would have played the tag team card and put his brother in.

Wlad wouldn`t have had the b*lls to get in the ring with genuine prime Tyson.

 

once again you prove that you're a joke, if Tyson's Prime was over at 23 then you have to take reference from young fights....I would contend that Wlad wasn't in his prime during the Purrity fight and as such my logic holds.

you should save yourself time and just copy and paste the same post over and over again

"IDKSAB but I hate Wlad"

 

Tyson's prime was over because he went into prison fool.

Wlad was over 2 years a pro and had 23 fights when Purrity blew him out. Why was he not prime??
Did it never happen again?

No, it DID happen again so that excuse doesn't run. Happened against Brewster and Williamson. He doesn't have the grit and endurance to be in a fight. Nothing to do with prime.
You brought up Tillis when Mike was a novice , so unless less you are a foolish hypocrite , by your own standards you have to accept Wlads TKO LOSS to Purrity and knowledge Mike is better cos he BEAT Tillis.

Pretty pathetic when I have to explain your own mind set to you. atsch

 

Tyson stops Wlad.

 

The thing is that Wald could be hurt, even Haye shook him up and may have been even more effective if he let his hands go more. Tyson had the ability to shake Wald up and when he had a guy hurt he had that killer instinct to finish a fight.

 

I like that post. Mike burned out early but that was his own weakness when compared to other greats. When arguing in terms of greatness the Tyson personal problems thing only goes so far, the fact is he didn't have the ability to get over it and come back, he had all the chances in the world as well. But prime on prime I still rate him against many of the greats, however he is at he back of my top 15 because of his inability to rise from the ashes.

 

:good

There's not a doubt in my mind, when I say that Mike was shot in 1990 onwards.

Between 85-88, he fought to his full capabilities, dedicating himself to the craft, with an eagerness to seek perfection.

From 89 onwards, he didn't.

People only scoff that he was shot, just due to his young age.

But he was shot.

He was only in love with boxing for his first three years as a pro.

I like Wlad.

But put him in a time machine, against the Spinks version of Mike, and he gets knocked out IMHO.