Prime Morales Vs Pacman???

Well it will be argued that MAB had beaten greater fighters than PAC etc etc etc and therefore longer/greater legacy..I cant argue that ..PAC has to beat JMM

Like I said though if PAC wins there is no longer a doubt..Top 50 ATG

Im just so damn tired of the what if what this and that

 

Not if he loses March No one will buy the argument..Like I said this one is the erase all doubts...on whos the best out of the four

sure If PAC wins there will still be plenty of detractors...but theyll just have to go and find a forum where thy could be taken seriously

 

wow bunch of idiots!

Morales was already washed up on their first bout... yea right! But was it a prime pacquiao?

 

shutup noob!

:smoke

 

Pac beat slightly past (but not shot) Morales to a pulp during the rematch that it took almost everything that was left in him... while in every fight Pac was improving and at the same time peaking.

Remember before the third fight that many here picked Morales to beat Pac again... buy sadly they were also the same people who where the first ones who said Morales was shot after Pac demolished him. Maybe Morales was shot during the rubber match... or maybe not... but one things for sure it was Pac's performance that made morales look more shot than anything else.


Threads like this tends to discredit Pac's victory against a great warrior in Morales and thats pathetic! Beating Morales whatever version it is, is more credible than beating Jandaeng, Jaca, polo, fana, salido, and valero of this world.

 

You cant argue like that because no one knows PAc before MAB..so its pointless..you argue going forward here..pick a starting point u..usually its when JMM schooled PAc and go from there..thats PAcs history here.

 

why would we believe you?

 

I have plenty of video of Pac before MAB...wtf are you talking about???

 

nope you guys are talking about prime vs. prime... what you dont know is when does a fighter reaches his prime.

so can you say pacquiao reached his prime already? and why?

edit: also if i say pac was in his prime when he beat sasakul, what was he after he beat barrera? superman?

 

wheres PacDbest to say Pac is better than SRR?

 

huh..my respond was post specific to another poster..and then you come in vitriolic?? I merely mentioned that you cannot use PAcs pre MAb career here on esb because it wouldnt sway anyones opinion..

No one is going to say dang PAC was a real beast back then , he is indeed just as good or better than Erik MAB or JMM..I mean these guys were never Flyweight champs

 

the thread title is really dumb already that's why im not surprised to see dumb answers also.

what if i open a thread asking... Who wins Prime Morales vs. Infant Pacman, how's that sound?

 

:rofl

 

PAcs prime was Labwadha and Julio..and MAB...then he got a big head..everyone knows this story of HBO manipulating Murad to get PAc to fight MAB ..they knew the money and the Mexico vs. Philippines..they knew the demographics...

HBO wasnt surprised when MAB got his ass handed to him...remember that this is PACs first fight at 126 .. Murad said hey Manny fight MAB..

I remember when PAC came back to Manila..His interview said he wanted to run for politics..it was mad in the Philiipines at that time..and for PAC its the start of the circus, end of serious training

If you watched 122 HBO fights for PAc esp Tyson/ Lewis undercard...the sentiment for PAc was when is he going to chase the Big Money fights at 126...

 

i don't agree, pacquiao still improved a lot after ledwaba. a fighter only reaches his prime when he is at his peak, health and skills wise. pacquiao back then was still learning how to box, all he needed back there to succed was just his ferocity and tremendous KO power.