Prime Muhammad Ali vs Prime Ezzard Charles

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by superman1986, Aug 31, 2017.


  1. superman1986

    superman1986 Active Member banned Full Member

    747
    386
    Jul 4, 2017
    From 1964-67, if a prime Charles was around, he arguably would have been Ali's best opponent. Of course, Ali would have to be favored, but Charles was arguably pound for pound the better fighter. But this isn't asking who ought to be favored, but how competitive would Charles make this fight, how long does it last and whats the result (UD, TKO etc)?

    Muhammad Ali

    This content is protected


    VS

    Ezzard Charles

    This content is protected
     
  2. Mr.DagoWop

    Mr.DagoWop Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    8,129
    1,764
    Jul 1, 2015
    Probably similar to the Patterson fights except Ali finds his mark much easier.
     
  3. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    32,232
    40,292
    Jan 8, 2017
    A young, prime Ali totally stops Charles before the tenth round. To fast, to everything against Ezzard.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member

    98,637
    30,518
    Jun 2, 2006
    I'm not so sure he stops Charles ,a prime Marciano hit him with everything and he was still there after 15rds and Charles was past his best then imo.
     
    slash and superman1986 like this.
  5. red cobra

    red cobra Loyal Member Full Member

    38,042
    7,581
    Jul 28, 2004
    Prime Charles was at lightheavyweight.
     
  6. Stevie G

    Stevie G Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,472
    9,357
    Jul 17, 2009
    Ezzard could well last the distance and have his moments but Muhammad convincingly decisions him.
     
    slash likes this.
  7. Fergy

    Fergy Walking Dead Full Member

    32,232
    40,292
    Jan 8, 2017
    No doubt s Charles was one tough nut and could suck it up when the going got tough. I think charles was one of those fighters like Holyfield that, as he reached his middle 30 s he went through a little golden patch, where he seemed more durable. So I have a younger Charles getting stopped but the Walcott /marciano slightly older version probably taking Ali's best punches bravely but ultimately losing a wide decision.
     
    slash, superman1986 and Stevie G like this.
  8. superman1986

    superman1986 Active Member banned Full Member

    747
    386
    Jul 4, 2017
    In 1949-50 which is included in his prime, he fought at heavyweight.
     
  9. Perry

    Perry Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,343
    1,539
    Apr 26, 2015
    Charles was great but Ali takes away his speed with his own peppering Charles at distance. Ali just would not be there to be hit in return. In a 15 round fight Ali stops Charles in ten rounds.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta and Shisha like this.
  10. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    52,169
    27,617
    Jan 3, 2007
    I would favor Muhammad Ali to win as I’m sure the majority would. But I think prime Ezzard Charles could give any version of Ali a better fight than some might think. He was one of the most skilled fighters of all time with speed, stamina, durability, generalship and had faced a wider range of styles than just about anybody. In the end I think Ali wins a decision but not without working for it. The deciding factor for me would be Ali’s superior speed, athleticism, reach and output.
     
    Last edited: Aug 21, 2026 at 9:10 AM
  11. Devon

    Devon Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,605
    6,964
    Dec 31, 2018
    Ali 116-112 or 117-111 type scorecard.

    Charles from the 1st Walcott fight (his prime IMO) would set traps and close the distance and land here and there with his own speed, may give him something to think about throughout, but Ali outboxes him from the outside for the most part and wins on the cards.
     
    mr. magoo likes this.
  12. PRW94

    PRW94 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,328
    4,073
    Nov 26, 2020
    Ali was too big and too fast but Charles stings him a few times on the way to losing a comfortable decision or getting stopped late.