Prime Naseem Hamed Vs Morales, MAB and JMM

Pat Cowdell UD12 Naseem Hamed

 

All three beat Hamed.

Barrera - Actually beat him (although Hamed gets the laughable past prime excuse here)

Morales - Was able to outbox Pacquiao in their first fight, would do the same to Hamed

Marquez - Would counter Hamed all night long. Might get put down at some point in the fight but would be able to get through it. Again, his fights with Pacquiao would be a decent barometer here.

 

Espadas, Zaragoza, Mckiney, Jones, ectect, None of them dudes fight ANYTHING like Hamed. Fact is, Hamed has always been a flawed fighter, even in his "prime" and guys like Barrera, Morales and Marquez would always be able to exploit his mistakes

. JMM actually does good against southpaws you dip****, just ask the guy who is considered by some as one of the best if not THE best southpaw ever. That and all his loses to southpaws, were controversial, and could of gone either way, plus none of those fighters fight nothing like Hamed, so your argument is flawed.

Hamed won 3 rounds at best against Barrera, and hit him with hard shots and still didnt knock him out, like many people predicted. Mckinny and Jones didnt fight the Barrera of 2001, who was better than the versions of Marco they fought. And Hamed chose to fight Barrera because he, like everyone else, thought Barrera was on the slide.

As for JMM, he was Hamed's mando for like 2 years, and hamed would shamelessly duck him, even Steward comfirmed this, and gave him a lowball offer with a very few weeks noticed, to make it seem like he wasnt ducking him, when in fact he had for the last 2 years. If JMM was able to time someone as fast and relentless and quite frankly flat out better than Hamed, in Manny Pacquiao, then i dont see why he couldnt time someone like Hamed.

The HBO team and almost everyone was sure that Hamed was gonna KO Barrera, but Barrera also made them eat their words when he schooled the hell out of Hamed, so The HBO team thinking Hamed would beat Morales really doesnt mean ****.

Morales with his vast height and reach advantages, his excellent boxing skills he used when needed, plus his iron chin would beat the **** out of Hamed anytime.

Got anything else to add? Please do so, so i can take your ass to school again, fanboy.

 

You are comparing Hamed to Ali now?? Okay

Like i said, Barrera was a more complete fighter by the time he faught Hamed, at the time he fought Mckinney and Jones, he was still mostyly a brawler. And no, Hamed won 3 rounds at best against Barrera, and the rounds he won werent all that dominant as like some of the ones Barrera won. Prime for prime, Barrera technique would still be too much for Hamed, and he wont be foolishly be coming foward like most of Hamed's opponents, Barrera would beat his with his superious jab, combination punching and overall better boxing skills. Morales was clearly more passed against Raheem, then Hamed vs Barrera..Hamed was not involved in the wars Morales was involved in, in particular wars like the 1st and 3rd Barrera fight, and the 1st Pacquiao fight.

Like i said, JMM was Hamed's mando for 2 years, yet he ducked him all that time. Oh and Pacquiao as relentless as he was, was still the better fighter Hamed ever was. He may not of had his power, but still packed a hard punch, plus blinding speed, crazy workrate and endless stamina..That same Pacquiao destroyed the same guy who made your hero his ***** :deal

You seem to bring up the Espadas fight alot, again Espada and Hamed fight nothing alike, and what the **** happened in the Espadas-Morales rematch? Morales, especially at 126lbs and 130lbs used his boxing skills more than he did when he was at 122lbs (which was when the Zaragoza fight took place), and his skills, added with his height and reach advantages, would cause all sorts of hell to Hamed, period.

Sorry, but simply put: Barrera, Marquez, and Morales are ALL simply levels ahead of Hamed. :hi:

 

A "prime" Hamed was NOT a better boxer than a 126lbs Barrera, period. Barrera would be too technically sound, and disciplined for Hamed, and would make him fight his fight, and would outbox him just like he did in '01. Barrera was simply the boxer, and fighter. Same goes for Marquez and Morales. You say Marquez hasnt beaten anyone of note, yet he was still clearly better than all of the other B-C level fighters Hamed was KOing. JMM, like Barrera, is a far superior boxer than Hamed ever was, and tho i could see him get KD in the early rounds, JMM would adjust and begin to pick him apart with his superior counterpunching, and combinations. Kevin Kelly was giving a "prime" Hamed hell before getting KO'd , Morales, Barrera, and Marquez are ALL much superior boxers than Kelly. Sorry, Hamed loses to all 3.

 

Prime Naseem Hamed can never beat a prime erik morales.Totally outboxed for 12 rounds.Naz was lucky MAB came to BOX when he beat him EASILY.I was hoping MAB was going to tear him apart that night.JJM POINTS.

At one stage i think Johnny Tapia was going to fight naz

 

The TS either knows nothing about boxing at all, or it taking the ****.

Awful post nonetheless, I didn't read it past a few lines, made my eyes hurt.

 

Funny how NONE of those you mentioned are in MAB's league.Hamed was ALWAYS a lazy trainer.ALWAYS!!When he was on the go,he was known for that.I love it when his supporters use that excuse(and they do quite frequently).So what he beat 6 current or future featherweight champions?All that proves is that there were(are) many alphabet organizations and gatekeepers.And even though I always liked Kevin Kelly,he was stopped just 2 1/2 years before fighting Hamed by someone so memorable that I can't remember his name,and he still gave hamed all he could handle anyway.McCullough's was a fighter I've always admired,but his best weight was 118.And I'm glad you mentioned Bungu because in 2 of the 3 fights(at 122)before fighter Hamed,he won one by MD and another by SD,although I only remember one of his opponnents in those 2 in Danny Romero.And if you've seen the fight,you would know that the score of 8-4 was quite generous for the overrated one as MAB exposed him badly that night.

 

at 35-0 hamed was past his prime? i'm watching this fight right now. barrera just whipped him. morales and marquez would beat him as well. i loved the prince when he was around. even though he was mostly hated, he was good for boxing. the brits are passionate fans which boxing needs more of but they have some of the worst excuses when their fighters lose.

 

Hameds best chance at his absolute peak best is against Morales, the others.....well...