Prime Naz stops opponent quicker than Marquez

huni get off your husbands account and go wash you hair or soming. let the big boys talk on this forum:good

 

No mate...........it dont work like that..........

But if one guy is struggling to hard tough 12 round distance fights against a certain fighter

And another fighter comes along and is smashing that same certain fighter up in 2 or 3 or 4 rounds

It suggests that fighter is more exceptional

No one done to

Remingio Molina
Steve Robinison
Vuyani bungu
etc

what Naz did to them

Not to mention become the first man to stop Medina

But dont think it is just Naz being a pure banger

WHAT IGNORANCE

Naz was exceptionally skilful..........with dazzling skills

and a unique style

and earlier on in his career he was a defensive wizard.......no-one could touch him

And some people here are saying that the limited straight forward Morlaes was more skilful

After some of his fights Morales was so marked up you think he had been in a car crash or something

Naz would hardly getting punched in a world title fight.............and you try telling me that he is not as skillful a fighter atsch

Some people here certainly dont know boxing :deal

 

Huni? What the ***?

 

And people can talk **** all they like

But Naz was on the way out of boxing anyway that much is clear

Early on in his career he was fighting 5 times a year

In the build up to the Barrera fight he fought just 2 times in 13 months

He was inactive alot..............very bad for a Featherweight

He didnt even want the Barrera fight

he took it because people were demanding he prove himself against long time rival Barrera

he was a part time fighter by the time he stepped in the ring with Barrera

 

Naz's main ambition was not to fight Barrera

He wanted ring legend Azumah Nelson

And was willing to go up to Super Featherweight to fight for Nelsons WBC title

Nelson was scared of Hamed though and ducked the fight

 

doesn't mean anything.

 

It's easy to be a "defensive wizard" when you are fighting sub-par fighters.

This is really bad logic. All you have to do is look back at history to know you are wrong. Ali went the distance many times with fighters not because he was a "less skilled" fighter but simply because he was not a powerful fighter. Compare Norton, Frazier, Foreman, Ali for example.

So by your logic not only would Foreman win but he is more "skilled" because he KOd Frazier whereas Ali had a hard time.

Again that tends to happen when you are fighting bottom of the barrel fighters.



School Dismissed.

 

You mean 40+ Azumah Nelson?

I can't say I disagree it would follow the mold of the type of fighters Naz fought. Big names, little substance.

 

what a load of ****

Steve Robinison...........WBO World Champion

Tom Johson............IBF World CHAMPION

Wilfredo Vasquez..........WBA Champion

to just name a few

the champions of his division..........hardly were able to lay a glove on him

its so easy and convient for you to say he was fighting "bottom of the barrel fighters"


your a complete dickhead

he cleaned out the ****ing division !!!!

and he done it in good style

get a reality check.............posters like yourself are the reason why the genral forum has such a bad reputation for ignorance

 

The WBO is 100% garbage. Besides an ancient Kevin Kelly and Medina what good-great fighter did he beat? I'll tell you which he didn't:

EM, JMM, Junior Jones, Freddie Norwood.

When he did step up to the elite level he lost!

 

apart from EM..........Barrera never beat them guys either :deal

 

Brawndo has what plants crave.

Brawndo is green like plants.

Bawndo has electrolytes.

Conclusion:
Plants crave Brawndo.

 

That logic is ******ed.

 

naz when he fought barrera was more shot than tyson was against mcbride.