prime pacquiao vs lomachenko

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hotshot, Nov 22, 2018.


  1. hotshot

    hotshot New Member Full Member

    57
    10
    Feb 4, 2018
    who would you rather watch and why?
     
  2. Boon

    Boon Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    4,235
    5,539
    May 2, 2015
    Pac, and if they fought each other Pac would send Loma into deep sleep very early
     
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2018
  3. Luis Fernando

    Luis Fernando Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,120
    1,275
    Aug 23, 2017
    Lomachenko, because he combines athleticism with far better technical and tactical abilities. Lomachenko had mastered his fundamentals, unlike Pacquiao.

    Furthermore, Lomachenko looks like a more coordinated and a more controlled boxer.
     
    Bluewhorl and FastSmith7 like this.
  4. BCS8

    BCS8 VIP Member

    60,456
    80,665
    Aug 21, 2012
    They're both freaking great to watch.
     
  5. BoyBato

    BoyBato Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,931
    1,236
    Apr 30, 2018
    The pac who lost against morales may lose to loma but the pac after that would maul loma. Pac is an absolute beast feasting on hof fighters in his prime. Loma and pac may be equal in talent but pac's power is the great difference.
     
    oldcanvasback and Jackstraw like this.
  6. The Akbar One

    The Akbar One Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    15,541
    5,275
    Dec 1, 2007
    The Pac that lost to Morales, lost because Morales made him wear those pillow like Winning gloves. That being said, that Morales would beat Lomachenko as well.
     
    tinman likes this.
  7. Bluewhorl

    Bluewhorl New Member Full Member

    4
    2
    Mar 8, 2018
    PAC man covered all the corners for me... and now Loma covers the same
    Two great fighters ..Loma needs to find his weight and rinse it..
     
    BCS8 likes this.
  8. Brighton bomber

    Brighton bomber Loyal Member Full Member

    31,295
    29,463
    Apr 4, 2005
    I personally prefer to watch Pacquiao, he was just a more dynamic fighter, his speed, power, work rate, combinations, he was just breathtaking to watch in his prime. I'll never forget him beating Barerra, that left me gobsmacked that anyone could dominate Barrera like that.

    Lomachenko is great to watch for different reasons. He's a beautiful boxer to watch, but more for the purists with his brilliant technique and defence.
     
  9. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,211
    5,816
    Oct 5, 2009
    same sentiment
     
  10. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,306
    9,900
    Jun 23, 2008
    I think Loma is absurdly overrated right now, especially on this forum. Prime Pac wouldn't have a tough fight with that scrub Linares.

    I think young Pac dismantles and stops Loma. I very much question Loma's ability to handle Pac's speed and firepower.
     
    22JM likes this.
  11. 22JM

    22JM Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,452
    3,928
    Sep 10, 2016
    Linares wouldn't see the 3rd round against prime Pac
     
  12. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,474
    17,527
    Apr 3, 2012
    Pacquiao would break down Lomachenko and stop him late.
     
  13. Sugar 88

    Sugar 88 Woke Moralist-In-Chief

    27,259
    18,341
    Feb 4, 2012
    If JMM can best lower weight Pac then so can Loma. Loma may also be brutally stopped
     
  14. BoyBato

    BoyBato Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,931
    1,236
    Apr 30, 2018
    Loma doesn't fight like marquez. Marquez was the perfect opponent for pac. But like i said the pac before the first morales loss was too crude and only relied on his money punch but the pac after was different.
     
    Brighton bomber likes this.
  15. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,474
    17,527
    Apr 3, 2012
    Their performances against Orlando Salido suggest that to not be true.
     
    Brighton bomber likes this.