Yes they are, and I think Golovkin is washed up, just like Kovalev was against Alvarez, except Golovkin is disciplined enough to keep his body in top shape in order to offset that decline.
You're talking nonsense. Canelo would have beaten him had he have been washed up. He wasn't washed up. He was overly cautious against one of the best opponents he'd faced.
Regal Cinemas is showing the ggg fight closed circuit for around 20bucks but u will have to check your local area
No he is washed up, against Jacobs he was up against a PED using, weight bully that came in as a lightheavy after rehydrating( Jacobs missed weight). Golovkin was washed up, Not as washed up as the version that fought Canelo though.
It reminds me when Joe Calzaghe was washed up and he still beat up faded but still elite versions of Hopkins and Roy. Joe had a drug addiction and weak hands, but that didn’t stop him.
Golovkin still prime enough mate. He looked like his usual self again against Vanes. You're best off to ignore that rank miscreant.
Even you can't be this stupid. You've obviously resorted to trolling. Joe was a P4P fighter coming off of the Kessler win, fighting in the same style, with the same shot output etc. Faded? Yes. Past his best? Yes. Washed up? No. If you want a perfect example of being washed up, you can use Roy from the fight which you've mentioned. Roy was a shell of his former self and no longer capable of winning at the highest level. That is the very definition of a fighter being washed up. He wasn't faded but still elite. If you want to say that GG is faded, okay. But he is not washed up. Tyson vs Williams and McBride are other examples of a fighter being washed up. GG is a great fighter and I'm a fan. It's just that he's not as good as what you thought he was.
I should have known better than to try and debate with you. It was only a year ago that you told me that today's group of MW's were better than the ones from the early 90's. So you're either a troll or you're absolutely clueless. We'll move on.