Prime Pavlik vs Middleweight greats?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Big Red, Feb 21, 2015.


  1. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,262
    15,327
    Jun 9, 2007
    Pavlik had some of the slowest hands I ever saw
     
  2. Smokin Bert

    Smokin Bert Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,118
    6,940
    Sep 8, 2013

    Exactly.
     
  3. Brixton Bomber

    Brixton Bomber Obsessed with Boxing banned Full Member

    21,934
    6,105
    Sep 21, 2013
    :lol::lol::good

    Sergio TOYED with Kelly, but Kelly gives Monzon hell? Ok.
     
  4. Cecil

    Cecil Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,102
    5,225
    Mar 22, 2015
    I think you guys are being a bit hard on Pavlik. On that montage did you not see him beating up on the immortal Gary Locket?
     
  5. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,338
    9,945
    Jun 23, 2008
    You're right. Monzon was SEVERAL levels better than Martinez.

    Monzon would batter the Holy Hell outta Pavlik.
     
  6. Azzer85

    Azzer85 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    28,283
    469
    Mar 13, 2010

    In Hopkins defence, they were close decisions, and he was about 40 years old at the time. And i think hed already ruled the division for about 10 years. And Taylor was....decent (but nothing special).

    Taylor also did put on a better performance against a much younger Hopkins than that other so called ATG, Calzaghe did.
     
  7. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,737
    29,087
    Jun 2, 2006
    It embarrassing isn't it?:oops:
     
  8. N_ N___

    N_ N___ Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,204
    93
    Oct 1, 2014
    He'd beat Lamotta. I knew there was someone out there.
     
  9. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    30,024
    36,813
    Jul 24, 2004
    The hate for Pavilk is palpable, my young jedi.
     
  10. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,499
    Jan 22, 2009
    Exactly:good
     
  11. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,338
    9,945
    Jun 23, 2008
    So saying that Pavlik couldn't beat guys like Hagler, Robinson, Tiger, and Monzon is hate? LMAO!

    No one hates Pavlik. He was a damn good offensive fighter. But limited to the point that there's many middleweights in history would have been too good for him.

    For the record, if he was around today, he'd batter Cotto and Canelo. Both those guys woulda been too small for Kelly.

    I don't think he'd beat Golovkin, but it'd be a savage fight. MUCH better matchup than Golovkin-Lemieux.
     
  12. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,424
    Aug 22, 2004
    My god, how HBO desperately wanted Pavlik to be really good. :lol:
     
  13. Clinton

    Clinton Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,234
    6,499
    Jan 22, 2009
    Who hates Pavlik? Let's be realistic. He was pretty good at world level due to his height, power and chin. But he was limited. I don't see any hate on this thread.
     
  14. Mr Butt

    Mr Butt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,678
    183
    May 16, 2009
    Sorry couldn't watch it as pavlik is so overrated by some it makes me want to vomit