PRIME RAZOR RUDDOCK VS IkE IBEABUCHI???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by anut, Oct 23, 2007.


  1. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    Who Wins/???
     
  2. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    do u guys think ike can take ruddocks smash coming in?????:smoke:smoke:smoke
     
  3. 626BrownBomber

    626BrownBomber New Member Full Member

    22
    0
    Jan 28, 2007
    Well, considering that Ike took everything that Tua could throw and then beat Tua, I think he could definetly take Ruddocks punch. It would have been a classic fight for sure. Two bangers, one with a granite chin, the other a decent chin going at it for suprimacy. I see Ike winning in a thrilling 9 th round ko or tko.
     
  4. razor

    razor Ali hater Full Member

    582
    0
    Jul 27, 2004
  5. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    ruddock was a lot bigger than byrd and tua
     
  6. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,865
    3,115
    Apr 16, 2005
    Ruddock's the more proven fighter. Ibeabuchi basically had TWO fights with top level fighters, and the Tua fight could have gone either way. He's ridiculously overrated based on what he actually did in the ring. Ruddock KO 6
     
  7. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    Pretty reasonable scenario.

    Out of curiousity who do you think is the bigger puncher?

    Ruddock or Tua?
     
  8. J_Roth

    J_Roth VRWC Hybrid Beaner Full Member

    2,990
    1
    Jan 12, 2005
    If Ruddock can't take Tommy's bombs do you really think he could take Ike's? Ruddock could have possibly stayed on the outside and boxed to a decision.
     
  9. Curtis Lowe

    Curtis Lowe Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,606
    1,076
    Feb 19, 2006
    Ruddock is one of the most overrated heavyweights in recent times. He never really beat anyone, if you think about it. He brutally KOed a past his prime Michael Dokes and that's it. Lost to Tyson, twice, lost to L. Lewis, badly and lost to Morrison. I think the only proven thing about Ruddock is he wasn't all he was cracked up to be.

    Ike by KO. And Ike wasn't really "proven" either, but at least he beat Tua and Byrd.
     
  10. brooklyn1550

    brooklyn1550 Roberto Duran Full Member

    24,017
    47
    Mar 4, 2006
  11. Zakman

    Zakman ESB's Chinchecker Full Member

    31,865
    3,115
    Apr 16, 2005
    Ruddock WAS overrated, that's true. But at least he actually fought some top fighters. Ibeabuchi fought a bunch of stiffs, got a very close - and debatable - decision over Tua, and knocked out Byrd, who wasn't really a natural HW. Ruddock's not that great, true, but at least he was in contention for a while, not just a "flash in the pan."
     
  12. Punisher33

    Punisher33 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,407
    8
    Oct 8, 2007
    Ike would knock him out in the 3rd, Ruddick being idiot he is would try trading with Ike which would lead to the KO. When Patterson was in his corner he rarely listened too him, he usually did the opposite. The fight would end early with a brutal knockout.
     
  13. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    There is no shame in Losing to Tyson and Lewis (both ATGs) and Morrison. With the exception of Lewis where it was over pretty quickly he was competitive with Tyson and Morrison. I think he deserves a little credit.
     
  14. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    RUDDOCK PUNCHES HARDER.
     
  15. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    RUDDOCK WAS PAST HIS PRIME WHEN HE FOUGHT MORRISON HE ALSO WEIGHED IN AT 243 3/4 LBS...........AND HAD A 15 MONTH LAYOFF:smoke:smoke:smoke