Prime Tony Tucker vs Prime Chagaev: Proof that this is a weak era.

Is this a joke? Tucker got knocked out by Ruiz and Herbie Hide. If he loses to guys like this, Chagaev will destroy him.

See. I can do the same thing too. Doesn't make a lot of sense, does it?

 

you beat me to it.

 

seems to me he has you rattled.

 

deep breaths....

seriously,calm down, your a decent poster but a tad melodramatic at times.

 

Tucker would of lost by UD, you taking the wrong fight with chagaev an wlad, of course wlad is going to make chagaev look bad,,,,no tucker loses, tyson was always in his chest, an i don't see why chagaev would not be,,,,UD, easy call

 

the pt the thread starter was making is that Chagaev isn't that good, which I totally agree with.

 

Tucker was a good heavyweight. He had his flaws sure, lack of head movement and sometimes a lack of fire in there, but he was a good solid pro.

Even with Tucker arguably never hitting what he could've achieved, mostly due to the financial and drug problems he had in the late eighties, I would pick him against Chagaev. And it's not that I think Chagaev is bad or anything.

 

I agree with that also. But Tucker was not that good either. It is basically a wash which he clearly does not believe. Tucker is not that much different than Chagaev and neither is the Heavyweight era in which the two fought in.

 

I think Tucker was clearly better but to each thier own.