prime trinidad vs pacman at 147 lbs??? who wins???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by anut, Oct 8, 2011.


  1. anut

    anut Boxing Addict banned

    6,731
    11
    Apr 4, 2007
    delahoya was shott to shitt when he fought apcman
     
  2. I1T2BOX

    I1T2BOX Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,713
    1
    Jun 5, 2010
    Tito was best at 154...outside of winky wright, I dont think anybody during that time makes it competitive for him at that weight.
     
  3. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    Even knowing what Pac's capable of, it's still tough to pick him against big strong HOF level welterweights with big power like ODLH or Trinidad in their prime. Either one of those guys is at least a full step up from Margo and Cotto.

    p4p, Pac. At WW, Trinidad. He just hits so goddam hard, I don't see how Pac could absorb shots like that.
     
  4. bernie4366

    bernie4366 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,681
    22
    Aug 29, 2006
    The DLH that Pac fought bears absolutely no resemblance to the DLH that Tito fought.
     
  5. Blood Green

    Blood Green Guest

    Pac. I respect Trinidad, but I think he'd lose for the same reasons Margo and Clottey did.
     
  6. ThePunchingBag

    ThePunchingBag Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,568
    4
    Nov 27, 2010
    Would be a helluva fight!
    I'd pick Pac by TKO, but if Tito hits him clean with one of those murderous One-Twos who knows? I doubt Pac has ever felt power like that, but he has a great chin after all...
     
  7. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,737
    Jan 4, 2007
    Yesh, I admit that Tito hit very hard, however, he wrapped his hands illegally every time he fought, and his purpose of doing this was to make his fists hit harder than usual. You can ask Hopkins about this because he's the first one who found out this cheat.:yep
     
  8. El Bujia

    El Bujia Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,744
    78
    Apr 4, 2010
    Nah dude, no way. Fighters from today hit way harder than they did when Tito was in his prime. Modern nutrition, brah. Did you forget? That's your argument pretty much every time one of these matchups is brought up.

    Also, since when the hell was Tito a one-two puncher? He was a left-hooker through and through.
     
  9. I1T2BOX

    I1T2BOX Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,713
    1
    Jun 5, 2010
    Compare KO % :roll:
     
  10. Whipdatass

    Whipdatass Boxing Junkie banned

    9,353
    2
    Aug 18, 2011
    Exactly. The difference was night and day when talking about Dlh/Pacquiao and Tito/Dlh. I rooted for Dlh and still think he won to this day. Tito also struggled to make 147 too.

    These young fans don't remember **** because they weren't watching boxing them. It's like me doing the math of who beat who on the 60's and 70's until someone who was around then gives the particulars that we never knew during that time.

    Tito couldn't box, and Pacquiao isn't a boxer, but both love to slug it out. Once Tito felt your power and realized you couldn't hurt him, he ran after you. Id give Pacquiao a chance, but I think Tito would be too big for Pac.
     
  11. Whipdatass

    Whipdatass Boxing Junkie banned

    9,353
    2
    Aug 18, 2011
    Yeah, and Pacquiao is a ****ing hgh user. Accusations can fly at any time.
     
  12. Whipdatass

    Whipdatass Boxing Junkie banned

    9,353
    2
    Aug 18, 2011
    Don't compare Cotto, Margarito, or Clottey to Trinidad. Ever! It took 12 one sided rounds for a legendary mw to stop Tito who moved up to mw from ww.
     
  13. ThePunchingBag

    ThePunchingBag Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,568
    4
    Nov 27, 2010
    :lol: nice one.
     
  14. cangryman

    cangryman Active Member Full Member

    722
    1
    May 29, 2009
    Dont compare Tito to Margo and Clottey FFS:patsch
     
  15. I1T2BOX

    I1T2BOX Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,713
    1
    Jun 5, 2010
    He takes mayweather @ 147 too! ***** anal hemorrhaging comming soon...