Prime Tua KO2 Prime Frazier. Discuss.

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Haggis McJackass, Mar 19, 2011.


  1. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    Right, because "peak" Frazier has a much better chin than the 29 year old, undefeated, 18 months removed from beating Ali version of Joe Frazier, right? The one who was a 3-1 favourite over Foreman?

    Forget about the Foreman fight? Why? Because he lost? If you take that Foreman and put him against an 18 month younger Frazier, does Joe's chin all of a sudden hold up to Foreman's punches now? :patsch

    Could be. Or maybe Tua lands a monster bomb in the first round before Frazier gets into his groove, and drops Frazier hard. Foreman did that and annihilated him.

    Yeah that may be so, but he is a smaller fighter who is known to be vulnerable early, facing a bigger, harder-hitting, better-chinned fighter who is known to be deadly in the first couple of rounds.

    All of Tua's weaknesses involve plodding around, being unable to close distance, and being frustrated at not being able to land on his taller opponent. None of that will be an issue here. All of Frazier's weaknesses involve starting slowly and not having a granite chin in the early going.

    Tua won't be frustrated that he can't find Frazier. Frazier will be right there for him to hit, that's the only way Frazier knew how to fight. He never minded taking two to land one. That's literally the worst possible fightplan against David Tua.

    :hat
     
  2. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    And Ali had a lot of trouble with sub-200 pounders that Tua would splatter across the ring. Doug Jones and Henry Cooper, for two of them.

    :hat
     
  3. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    Excuses, excuses. You know that at the time of the Byrd fight, Tua's entire life was in ruins thanks to his years-long court battle with his father figure, the man who had run his career since he was 15? I guess we can just pretend that loss never happened then eh? :patsch

    :hat
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,815
    51,879
    Mar 21, 2007
    Oh much, much, much better. Huge difference. If you really can't see it on the film consider the facts.

    Frazier, after FOTC, had such high blood pressure that he was treated for a potential stroke.

    He was blind in one eye.

    His arthritis had begun to trouble him in earnest.

    Most of all, he had lost that desire for perfection. In some fighters this matters less - when a swarmer losses that top 1% he's lost a deep reserve. This style doesn't have inferior longevity because of the specifics of the style, it has inferior longevity because technicians and punchers and boxers, when they are world class, they can afford to lose that top 1%. Swarmers, pure pressure fighters, speed-pressure fighters, they can't lose that tiny top 1% because it translates into 8, 9, 12% in terms of performance.

    Not literally of course, but you get the idea.
     
  5. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    102
    Dec 26, 2009
    difference is Ali actually won that fight. Tua got outboxed and lost a clear decision
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,815
    51,879
    Mar 21, 2007
    :lol:
     
  7. tommygun711

    tommygun711 The Future Full Member

    15,756
    102
    Dec 26, 2009
    they were talking about the cooper fight when Ali got floored, right? that doesnt compare to getting outboxed by byrd.
     
  8. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,815
    51,879
    Mar 21, 2007
    Yeah.
     
  9. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    I didn't really get the chance to study how he looked or if there was a HUGE difference. The first minute was even, then Foreman spent the rest of the life dribbling Frazier like a basketball. :good

    A half-blind, arthritic, 29 year old potential stroke victim was also an undefeated heavyweight champion and a 3-1 favourite over an undefeated 24 year old Foreman?

    After the Foreman fight, Frazier had enough left to KO Joe Bugner in 2 rounds, stop Jimmy Ellis and Jerry Quarry, and go 26 close rounds with Muhammed Ali. You talk about him like he was the current version of Joe Frazier.

    This is a better argument.

    I submit to you that the reason Frazier looked like **** against Foreman was because of Foreman. Specifically because Foreman was a bigger, stronger, harder punching guy who Frazier couldn't move backwards, but who could walk Frazier back. You see it plainly - multiple times Foreman puts both hands on Frazier's shoulders and shoves him backwards to reset him.

    Foreman's greater physical strength allowed him to manhandle Frazier and push him around the ring. Frazier wasn't used to the other guy being clearly stronger. Tua would be able to hold his ground as well. That right there spells danger for Frazier.

    If he makes it out of the first 2 rounds he should be fine. But he started slow and demonstrated on several occasions that he could be hurt early, before he warmed to his task. If Tua hurts him early, he is DONE.

    :hat
     
  10. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    Right, knocked down twice in the first 2 minutes of round 2, with the three-knockdown rule in effect, that's no trouble at all. :patsch

    :hat
     
  11. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    Throw Chris Byrd in that ring instead of Doug Jones, and the Ali fans may get an unhappy surprise.

    :hat
     
  12. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,815
    51,879
    Mar 21, 2007
    Those are only the facts, if you don't like them there is absolutely nothing I can do about it.

    I told you what happened to him. Everything I said was absolutely correct. Only my appraisal of the swarmer was a matter of opinion and I stand by every word.

    As for his results post-Foreman he was still a very good fighter. But along with the sight in one he had lost the drive that made him persistently, the best conditioned fighter in the ring as well as the most driven and perfect swarmer since Armstrong. I see you don't like that, but as I said, there's nothing I can do about it.


    All of this is true. The facts i've provided for you about Frazier's condition are also true. Where is the contradiction?

    Yeah, you've said that already, about six times. We agree. I still pick Frazier to beat Tua 3-0 if they are matched between 68 and 71 for reasons I outlined earlier.
     
  13. frankenfrank

    frankenfrank Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,968
    70
    Aug 18, 2009
    Tua by early decapitation. Frazier goes out on his shield (stretcher) .
     
  14. Haggis McJackass

    Haggis McJackass Semi-neutralist Overseer Full Member

    5,126
    1
    Jul 20, 2004
    :lol:

    I don't even think Tua beats Frazier more often than not. You see peak Frazier winning 3-0. But do you see him winning 10-0? :think :good

    :hat
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    114,815
    51,879
    Mar 21, 2007
    No. 10-0 is a bit beyond the realms. He could lose one of three even, it's not a particularly confident pick. You always have to be nervous when a pressure fighter meets a pure-puncher, no matter how limited the puncher and how excellent the pressure fighter.