Prime Tunney Replaces Corbett vs. Jeffries

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by guilalah, Oct 25, 2010.


  1. guilalah

    guilalah Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,355
    306
    Jul 30, 2004
    Who wins in:

    1900 (25 rounds)?

    1903 (20 rounds)?

    Assume prime Tunney in both fights; Jeffries as he actual was at time of each of his fights with Corbett.


    You may also speculate on other scenarios.
     
  2. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,810
    47,683
    Mar 21, 2007
    Very, very difficult fight to pick over these distances. In spite of the shorter distance I'd guess that Jim's chances are better in 03.
     
  3. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,566
    Nov 24, 2005
    I believe Jeffries was a better fighter in 1903.

    I dont know how prime Tunney compares to a prime Corbett, but I'll credit him with at least being better than a 1900 Corbett, enough so that I'd say he'd beat Jeffries in 1900 (as would a prime Corbett, IMO).
    But I'll favour Jeffries in 1903.
     
  4. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,526
    27,110
    Feb 15, 2006
    So do I.

    Jeffries got his tactics completely wrong in the first encounter, and only pulled it out of the hat by switching his fight plan late in the fight. Against the more durable Tunney he likley would not get away with this lapse of judgment.

    The second time round Jeffries had improved significantly, and his tactics were better judged.

    If I had to guess then:

    1900 Tunney UD

    1903 Jeffries late TKO
     
  5. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,674
    28,995
    Jun 2, 2006
    The longer distance would help Jeffries, imo.
    I pick Tunney to win the first fight clearly, I believe he was better than a prime Corbett, let alone one who was 33 had not won a fight in 6 years. Tunney was more durable than Corbett, and hit harder.
    The second fight ,with an improved Jeffries,is problematic.Jeffries was better ,but by how much? Hard to gauge, because Corbett was worse ,nearly 37, he had not fought for 3 years. I think I would go for a Tunney win by close decision with Jeffries coming on like gangbusters late,but Tunney's early lead being enough to take it.
     
  6. apollack

    apollack Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,225
    1,635
    Sep 13, 2006
    You can run but you can't hide. Jeffries could take everything Tunney threw and would keep pressuring him until he finally landed the bombs that either wore him out or took him out. Don't bet against a young Jeff in a lengthy bout.
     
  7. eslubin

    eslubin Active Member Full Member

    558
    0
    Nov 29, 2009
    You can't become great fighting great boxers by just being able to take a butt-whipping. Jeffries was huge in 1899 but by 1929 he would be barely above average in size. They thought Jeffries could fight for a million rounds. They didn't think he could catch up with anyone but so long as he took them late and could take a beating they would slow down. That plan is bunk. They figured Johnson would take a short bout on cleverness so they make it 45 rounds. The longer it goes the boxer's chances always go up. And probability he gets a KO goes up.

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROUiZnnFfAw[/ame]

    www.youtube.com/eslubin
     
  8. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,126
    45,402
    Feb 11, 2005
    Tunney is heads and shoulders above poor old Jeffries in the science dept. And even Big Jeffries strength was overrated in my opinion. A prime Tunney schools his ass.
     
  9. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,504
    4,923
    Aug 19, 2010
    in 25 rounds I really dont no
     
  10. Cael

    Cael Claudia Cardinale Full Member

    3,379
    8
    Sep 17, 2010
    Hard to judge prime Jeffries and Corbett without footage.

    I assume that Big Jeff would have the edge over tunney in a 25 round attrition war.
    Hard to tell
     
  11. Boilermaker

    Boilermaker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,372
    473
    Oct 6, 2004
    But Jeffries could actually fight as well. Well enough that he was never beaten.

    You do understand that there were still big guys in Jeffries time, that were bigger than him, it is just that they werent better than him.

    Who is they? Hulk HOgan and Eric Bishoff?

    Why did they think this? He didnt really stop anyone at all due to attrition, that i can recall. The closest was reportedly Bob Fitzsimmons, who has one report telling us that he was so tired that he left himself open for the KO. But even then, it is Jeffries power, not stamina that caused the wear down. Jeffries KOd plenty of power. They thought that he was too big, fast, strong and good for fighters it is just that some of the great ones gave him a little bit of trouble. In fact, not too dissimilar to the way some of the great ones gave Ali a little trouble. Difference being that Jeffries power always bailed him out, where as Ali had a few hickups and failures along the way.

    They made it 45 rounds because that was the custom of the time for big fights and they didnt want controversy. Blind Freddy could tell you that if Johnson (or any other younger opponent) had not been beaten in 25 rounds, it is unlikely that the older man is going to be going as well as had been hoped and the pendulum swings in favour of the young man.

    Interesting statement. I dont necessarilly disagree with it at all. But still, I am not sure that is what They said in the Sugar Ray Robinson v Joey Maxim fight. Would it make a difference to Tunney that it was really hot on the day of the fights in question?


    Jeffries must start favourite against Tunney for the reasons of experience, proven performance against World Class heavyweights, proven performance against all time great light heavyweights, Size, Power, etc. But in fairness to the reigning lineal Champion, Gene Tunney he has his advantage as well, and i definitely see a good chance of an upset. Realistically though, i am fairly sure that if born in Jeffries time, Tunney would delay this fight until around about the Johnson fight or maybe a couple of years before, before striking and would defeat Jeffries through age. Not to dissimilar to the way he beat Dempsey.

    www.youtube.com/eslubin[/QUOTE]
     
  12. Ramon Rojo

    Ramon Rojo Active Member Full Member

    624
    22
    Dec 5, 2005
  13. MagnaNasakki

    MagnaNasakki Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,658
    78
    Jan 21, 2006
    Tunney was in supreme shape, was a terrific craftsman, and would have been even harder to handle for Jim than Corbett. Tunney was simply the next in the line Corbett started, and better in every way.

    UD each time.
     
  14. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,810
    47,683
    Mar 21, 2007
    It's the distance though. I agree that Tunney was better than Corbett - what maybe hasn't been said is that he has more style advantages over Jeffries than any fighter going. It's the distance though. Can Tunney do the distance with Jeffries? I guess i'd bet he could, if I were gamblng, but I wouldn't be confident in 03.
     
  15. Unforgiven

    Unforgiven VIP Member banned Full Member

    58,748
    21,566
    Nov 24, 2005
    Was Tunney better than Corbett ?
    What makes people say that ?

    I'm allowing that he was superior to the post-prime Corbett who Jeffries beat, but I'll admit I have no evidence. It's just "for argument's sake".
    And I dont even see that justification for a prime-for-prime comparison.