Prime tyson beats prime holyfield, convince me.

i did understand perfectly your point but...
bruno was not better than any version of foreman ,bruno was not better than briggs, who foreman did beat crearly, the old foreman 91 who fought holyfield would ko bruno hands down).like i said.... bruno had a glass chin, foreman had iron chin, if moorer could take the shots of foreman during several rounds, he might take the shots from bruno (who was not fast or explosive ) during all the fight , bruno was not even close to foreman in hitting power . do you understand the difference now?

so yes, it is blasphemy

 

please don´t continue with your great argument, it is too much for anyone

 

spoon was not a pretty good puncher, he was a decent boxer-puncher, end of the history.no ****ing way smith was a great puncher, average puncher and it is to say so much. mccall said that bert cooper and buster douglas were harder punchers than lewis, so lewis was not a top puncher. bruno was destroyed by 2 bad versions of tyson. in few words.. he lost against every decent fighter that he faced.
not, briggs was better than bruno,and foreman even in 1994 had better chin than bruno my a mile and he was much stronger and harder puncher. foreman was more durable and he had great experience, bruno was a young bum, simple.

 

holyfield wins.. wrong style for mike