Prime Tyson vs 70s Heavyweights

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by kolcade4, Mar 11, 2014.


  1. kolcade4

    kolcade4 Keep Punchin' Full Member

    1,592
    5
    May 1, 2009
    So it begins , for all of the Tyson haters and fans , how does he match up ? My apologies if this has already been a thread which I'm sure it has in some way or another .
     
  2. TheSouthpaw

    TheSouthpaw Champion Full Member

    7,942
    61
    Jul 21, 2012
    Tyson would had his hands full with Ali, Frazier,.Norton, and Foreman.
     
  3. hookfromhell

    hookfromhell Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,861
    48
    May 5, 2011
    Norton? Tyson KO 6 latest. Tyson beats everyone except Foreman
    and Ali. However Tyson could dent Foreman's chin, and could
    SD ALI over 12. There's some great live underdogs though
    Lyle, Quarry, etc. Jimmy Young could trouble or beat him
    as well. Tyson would pretty much clean up any division though.
     
  4. kolcade4

    kolcade4 Keep Punchin' Full Member

    1,592
    5
    May 1, 2009
    Aren't you late for your date with Grimace and Ronald? Pipe in or split !
     
  5. kolcade4

    kolcade4 Keep Punchin' Full Member

    1,592
    5
    May 1, 2009
    I can see this as being true with Norton and Frazier being the least worry out of the four IMO .
     
  6. kolcade4

    kolcade4 Keep Punchin' Full Member

    1,592
    5
    May 1, 2009
    I like the Jimmy Young reference as being a wildcard by winning the decision vs Foreman and losing the 15 rounder to Ali . Didnt he knock off Lyle and Shavers? He kinda was the Danny White (Dallas Cowboys Qb) of that era,was fantastic but just couldnt quite win the big one , Jerry Quarry like . Speaking of those two that wouldve been a fantastic fight to see . Tyson Kos Quarry though and Jimmy Young is a toss up . That was painful for me to say that Tyson would KO Quarry bc Quarry is one of my all time favs.
     
  7. kolcade4

    kolcade4 Keep Punchin' Full Member

    1,592
    5
    May 1, 2009
    I'm sorry you have resorted to such antics, peace be with my brother . Disagreements are that of this great leisure pleasure of human competition . Subjective and Objective opinions are what make this sport beyond a gentlemens game. As the words of my hero " Boxing is a demanding sport and you win alone and you lose alone ." The words you choose are harsh and I respect every phrase spent verbally by conflicting boxing fans and that is what makes this sport undeniably a gift . Objective and subjective opinions are what make this sports and forum move and continue to be without a doubt the greatest sport in he history of man. I apologize if my opinions differ from your meager attempt at insult . Accusations of such foul acts are truly a fabrication in your fictional reality . I've tried to respect your opinions however without success failure dominates. You are obviously a very close minded dress wearing individual that I could give two farts about . Good luck with your armchair QB /armchair blog . Best of luck!!!!
     
  8. Foxy 01

    Foxy 01 Boxing Junkie banned

    12,328
    131
    Apr 23, 2012
    Its really quite simple. Just look at the list on the other thread of the guys who Tyson beat to gain his reputation. Then compare them with the four mentioned above.

    If the differences aren't glaringly obvious perhaps Tyson fans should look for a new hobby. These are guys in the Holyfield mould, no fear whatsoever of Tyson, who would take the fight straight to him, thus gaining a huge advantage over the mentally fragile New Yorker.
     
  9. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,573
    46,180
    Feb 11, 2005
    Tyson's footwork was faster than Ali by this point and he batters him with harder shots and wins by convincing decision. He was much more powerful than the attrition puncher Frazier and quicker to the target so he KO's him at some point early, no doubt here. Foreman present the biggest obstacle… that's a good fight. If you consider Foreman prime against Lyle, I would say Tyson takes it emphatically. If that's not the case then we have a difficult stylistic match up for Mike.

    And the rest of the 70's were B-raters primarily so I don't include them...
     
  10. rski

    rski Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,568
    1,795
    May 12, 2013
    Id agree that Ali Foreman would be his main concern. I think he has a better chance with Foreman though. Tyson had a decent chin so it is likely he could have taken a few Foreman bombs and come back with some of his own. The thing that swings it towards Forman for me is that he showed that toughness you need to beat Tyson, the unwillingness to accept defeat, the way he fought against Lyle for instance. He showed a greats ability to win. If he kept getting up and coming for Tyson and continuing to land those bombs I see Mike having a few problems. Forman was a beast as well, but a bigger beast. Saying that I still go with the belief Tyson would take out old Foreman, which is a common debate.

    I think Ali had the ability to outbox Mike for 12/15 rounds and he obviously had the toughness/chin to take on Tyson’s attacks if he had to. I don’t see it plain sailing for Ali though, I just think he could out box Mike and bedazzle him with fast jabs and combinations.

    The others 70s fights would be decent wars, such as Frazier, Norton and Savers. I see Tyson winning all of those. This is one reason I put him in my top ten heavies, I only see a handful of greats beating prime Mike, even though many of them had better resumes.
     
  11. Entaowed

    Entaowed Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,837
    4,174
    Dec 16, 2012
    Kolcade you were doing great re: rising above bitter juvenile insults; no need to throw in the dress wearing fusillade.

    The thread about Tyson's competition showed definitively & by fight how well Tyson did against who, & how long they had often been without a loss before & after he fought them. It is an UNUSUAL era & HW who fights ATG or near it competition in their prime, still Tyson had a relatively GOOD level of competition, packed a lot of fights into a short time period, beat so many bigger than him, & fought everyone around.

    If you cherry-pick & distort for a critique you can make ANY figher seem like he whipped basically catatonic pre-sc:deskhoolers.
     
  12. perko

    perko Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,808
    7
    Nov 3, 2010
    Tysons style is absolutely perfect for Frazier - the fabled left hook behind the bob and weave is going to land hard and often on Mikes chin . Tyson aint no Foreman pushing Joe away out of range and letting off bombs - hes right there in the punching pocket against a man who revelled in the streetfight style.
     
  13. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,113
    25,278
    Jan 3, 2007
    He definitely has a chance of beating all of the best men of that decade, especially considering that Ali was a bit past it. But in reality I'm guessing that he beats the vast majority while dropping a loss or two to somebody.
     
  14. clinikill

    clinikill Active Member Full Member

    728
    771
    May 24, 2010
    Tyson was faster and more powerful than Frazier. Mike also was a quicker starter. Joe would undoubtedly eat plenty of Tyson's bombs, and I don't think his chin is sturdy enough to withstand them.
     
  15. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,113
    25,278
    Jan 3, 2007
    Agreed.

    Mike's chin is arguably better too. It survived the artilary of Smith, Bruno and Ruddock. It generally took a sustained beating over many rounds to make Tyson crumble, which Frazier was capable of, but I don't think he'd last long enough to make it happen.