Prime vs Prime Mike Tyson vs Wlad Klitschko Who Wins?

Wlad wasn't prime when he fought Puritty again don't try to twist things to meet YOUR agenda.

Depends when you class Tyson as being prime, prior to jail he lost against Douglas who would have been a borderline top 10 today about the same as Brewster.

Post jail Tyson was still young enough to be viewed as still very good and he was carefully matched and lost everytime he stepped up.

Having said that if Tokyo Douglas was about no one would stand a chance.

 

Excellent analysis Bernstein best watch his back.

 

I detect sarcasm in your reply, but ghettowizard's post was 100% accurate. :deal

 

Yes lets leave Puritty out of it. Instead lets talk about Brewster who had previously lost to both Shufford and Ettiene....an Ettiene Tyson in fact destroyed. Lets talk about Sanders who never before or after beat a top 10 rated heavyweight and lost to Nate Tubbs. Come on, lets talk about that.

 

who the phuck "loves Golota". He's one of the most dislike-able fighters ever. glass jawed mental midget

 

Tyson beats glass jawed big heavyweights like Wlad and Lennox Lewis, loses to skilled big heavyweights with better chins like Vitali and George Foreman .

 

Since when did Tyson become a good inside fighter? He never was. He was inactive and docile in clinches.
Tyson was only effective from close-midrange. If you keep him way on the outside like Lewis or Douglas did(and what Wlad would do) or way on the inside like Holyfield did then he really isn't very effective.

 

Tyson could fight coming in landing body shots to open up the head. Wlad can do neither of those things.

 

Not true... He CAN he just chooses not to......

 

Err Buster Douglas??

 

I'm sure Tyson got KTFO by the glass chinned Lennox Lewis, I could be wrong though.... :rofl

 

When was Tyson carefully matched? post prison probably yes, if thats what you refer to.

How can a guy who was declining, go to prison, come out at the age of 30 and still be good?

The only reason Tyson got as far as he did post prison was purely punch power.

And secondly you're saying he stepped up and lost, to who?

Evander Holyfield and Lennox Lewis, certainly no mugs.

 

No it was because he fought frozen Tomato Cans not because of punch power.

 

This is based on some fantasy version of Wlad that does not exist.

Wlad never kept anybody at range with the jab. Nobody. Ever.
Not even cement boots Peter in two fights.

Manny had to scream at him for holding Peter in fight two because the fat , plodding Peter kept closing the gap.
When he was a bit fresher , he had Wlad crawling around on the canvas.

That is a fact and to say Wlad can keep Tyson at bay with a pawing jab, who darted around the ring at lighting speed, had impenetrable defense and slipped and countered far better jabs than Wlads is a laughable assessment and just plain lies.

Douglas beat Tyson by fending him off with furious combos, movement , angles and uppercuts.
When Wlad had to fight like that against Brwster , he didn't see past 5 orunds.
If Buster was to just stand there and try hug him when he came in, he would of got knocked the fuk out.
You think Wlad can stand in front of Tyson and think a hug is going to protect him:nut
James Smith eat punches doing that tactic that would of had Wlad out for the 10 count.
Wlad has to fight a fight he's never shown in his life to beat Tyson.

A glass jawed boxer like Wlad would exist exactly like Carl Williams did in round one.
A Tyson left hook to the head after sliipping the jab.

 

Nice try , but you didn't write that. You copied it from the **** rag that is the Heavyweight blog.

http://www.heavyweightblog.com/211/mike-tyson-kos-wladimir-klitschko-in-1-round

That monstrosity of a blog will tell you the version of Mormeck that Wlad beat would of been Ali's best win, so in short that whole post is utter drivel.


http://www.heavyweightblog.com/4082...n-and-wladimir-klitschko-vs-jean-marc-mormeck

And to start it by calling Douglas 'feather fisted' proves you know nothing about boxing whatsoever.