i knew that you would pick floyd against a prime oscar while saying that a prime pac vs oscar is a joke. floyd barely beat a past it oscar, what makes you think he will beat him in his prime?
Because the Oscar that fought Floyd was WAY WAY WAY better than the Oscar that fought Pac. I favor Floyd by 10% to beat a prime Oscar. That doesn't count Oscar out nor do I doubt him, if anything it's closer to 50 / 50 but I made it 55/45 because I do favor Floyd to beat Oscar. Floyd beat Oscar by 116-112 easily and Oscar wasn't that past it. You have to remember. EVERYTING was in Oscars favor. What if they fought in their primes in a neutral setting?
and this fight was roach's reference why he said oscar could not pull the trigger anymore. floyd was younger and way faster than oscar. what more advantage do you want?
you mean oscar? of course he is but oscar is past his prime. if a prime p4p#1 floyd barely won a SD against a past-it oscar, how do you think he will fare against a prime oscar? it's ironic for floyd fans to say that pac-oscar in their prime is a joke when they think that floyd would win against oscar in his prime.
You would have to assume this fight would take place at 135 !!!!! De La Hoya by an easy TKO round 4 !!!!!!!
Does 55/45 come off as a clear UD for Floyd in their prime? Their fight that happened was a clear UD for Floyd.
a clear UD? was that the official result? i'm just laughing at your bias for floyd when you said that oscar would KO pac and that the fight would be a joke when you have the opinion that floyd would be the favorite against a prime oscar when floyd had a hard-time winning a SD over a past-prime version of oscar.
My bias? Because Pac who has been KOed twice and stunned by opponents at lower weight classes gets KOed by Oscar? But Floyd who has took flush shots against strong punchers and not gone down is considered bias? You've become a *******. I guess because I slightly favor Floyd to beat Oscar Im VERY bias