Primes: Hagler versus Pavlik?

:huh

 

Yep, and there goes the "smash glass in case of emergency" post.

You'll be talking about the Status Quo again soon, won't you :nut

 

I noticed HAGLER getting hurt and being very easy to hit ! the same as usual ! And to say HAGLER definitly does this is rediculous ! :deal

 

You live the status quo bud ! the one associated with the ALL TIME GREAT LIST ! :bbbPS PAV just crushed HOPS DADDY ! You know the ALL TIME GREAT HOPS !

 

Hmmm.....Hagler KO's Hearns and Hagler was lucky because Hearns has a weak chin. Hearns beats the **** out of Barkley who is on the verge of getting stopped and lands a KO punch, and Barkley 'owns' Hearns :nut

Hagler gets criticised for not KO'ing Welterweights by yourself, then you give kudos to Pavlik for getting up off the floor and KO'ing someone who couldn't KO a welterweight.

:nut :nut :nut :nut :nut :nut :nut :nut :nut :nut :nut :nut

 

Hops daddy?? 2 close fights with a 40+ years old champion??

Yep, your username is really appropriate.

 

Sorry but TAYLOR is the guy who dethroned AN ALL TIME GREAT ! And I never claimed HAGLER got lucky or that he would lose to PAVLIK ! I said it would be a different fight then the fight with TOMMY ! And Im sure you know HAGLER needed 15 rounds to beat an OLD LIGHTWEIGHT who wasnt running away ! remember !:yep

 

he beat the guy who moved up and beat the reigning light heavyweight champ ! thats not to shabby !:hi: Hes HOPS DADDY !

 

This is a legit discussion. Kind of. Pavlik would have been a top contender in the Hagler era. But the answer to the question is obvious. The Pavlik that got knocked down in round two wouldn't have been allowed to finish the round if it was Hagler instead of Taylor.

- Jason

 

You are one ******ed mother****er..:rofl:roflnut He beat JT so he beats bhop...lol....he owns bhop..wow.....just ****ing wow....You are a dumb ass canadian bacon *****.

 

Your actually to stupid to understand sarcasm ! And it was simply to make fun of the ALL TIME GREAT ARGUMENT that is constantly used here ! :good Is that simple enough for you ?:hi:

 

atsch well by that standard the guy who needed 15 rounds to win a close decision against an old fat lightweight would neither outbox or ko a guy like PAVLIK ! But we all know this argument doesnt hold water now dont we ! Because by that standard the guy who needed to be saved by the bell against COOPER would never have beaton LISTON or GEORGE ect ect and so on and so forth !:yep

 

Hagler would dominate and knock out pavlik. Hagler knew how to throw punches correctly, unlike Taylor. Hagler would've landed a LOT.

 

Is Pavlik at his prime? Or can he become better??
If so, then make your call