Primes: Hagler versus Pavlik?

Well a slow power shot is not easy to land.. And it takes the fighter many failed attempts to get it in there. By that time the other guy is countering your failed attempts. You fail to realize the speed difference and all around defense and skill difference. Hagler had a good chin..............But he never left it out in the air to be hit.

 

:smoke His height my friend was his biggest advantage ! Do you think a 5 foot 10 LL would beat MIKE ? I dont think so !:hey

 

You always pick the bigger guy, and failing that the taller guy when they're both at the same weight.

 

:nut he was never that hard to hit my friend !

 

atsch Not true and Im actually not picking anyone here if you didnt notice !:deal

 

A 5'10" Lennox Lewis wouldn't fight like a 6'5" Lennox Lewis. He'd fight like Mike Tyson.

 

Only because you realize that the odds are so ridiculously stacked in Hagler's favor that it would be foolish to state Pavlik wins outright.

 

On the top of his bald headnut:nut Hagler kept his chin tucked and head and body moving. You are a crackhead:--(

 

atsch Absolute bull**** !

 

because he would have the height advantage ! :nut get it !

 

A lot harder to hit than Pavlik, though. And unlike Pavlik, he can't be hurt when the punches connect.

 

Hearns wasn't as heavy handed as Pavlik

Go to bed, you're making a **** of yourself.

 

No, because fighters of different heights fight differently. Just like a 6'5" Lennox Lewis would be a moron to fight like Tyson.

Get it?

 

:smoke But PAv would have the heavier hands and that would be hard on HAG ! And I dont think HAGLER had the kind of power to get PAV out quick ! It would be a war ! And an interesting one !

 

atsch HEIGHT is an advantage get it ! And of cource you fight different without the advantage ! Light handed guys fight different then heavy handed guys also ! Do you think power isnta an advantage ! Quit the ******ed spinning man !