Primes: Hagler versus Pavlik?

hahahahaha. So fighter A beats fighter B. Therefore B gets beat by C even though he matches up stylistically very badly. Way to analyse mate :good

Pavlik is not a brawler. He is a boxer. He would get knocked the **** out. Either trying to box/brawl Hearns.

 

BARKLEY was almost koed by a 38 year old lightweight bud ! PAV got caught with a perfect shot but he still game back ! And since when does getting hurt once equate to this ?? Do you think ALI had a glass chin becasue he was almost out against COOPER and so on and so forth ! get it ! :deal

 

atsch I was comparing the result TOMMY got when facing a similar fighter only with less skill ! And isnt that why people are picking HAGLER ! because of his beating other fighters !:yep christ man come up with something better then this !:tired

 

What? Who are people compairing to Hagler that Pavlik has fought? A relentless, iron chined, hard hitting, southpaw?

Look at it stylistically: Pavlik would get badley outboxed and loose a wide descsion couple that with the fact that he has a poor defence and Hearns has monster power. Odds are that Pavlik gets KO'd.

Hagler would eat what Kelly had and batter him to ****. I would bet the house on that.

 

So how did you come to all these conclusions about MARV if it had nothing to due with who he fought ? Your contradicting yourself bud ! Go take a breath !:yep

 

I said when you are looking at fighters look at their attributes:

Who they fought fine then: who has Kelly fought like Pavlik? That would lead you to belive that Pavlik could win?

 

It'd be a war. Hagler KO 11.

 

Pavlik v Pavlik on the undercard of Pavlik v Taylor.

 

Impossible to know of course but I would lean towards Marvelous. I can see him getting on the inside and breaking down the long body of Pav.

 

atsch I never claimed KELLY would win ! I simply claimed that the people saying it would be a walk in the park for MARV are wrong ! I gave my reasons already ! :deal

 

Obviously, not a good joke.

 

How do people post **** like this and get away with it.


Hagler by pure pain and early stoppage.

 

Rumsfeld, you started this **** storm and then just said...."thoughts.......". You never stated who you would pick and why. If you feel Hagler would "obviously' demolish the **** out of the 25 year old NEW champion, why start the thread. Unless you were wanting to try to honestly say in your opinion Pavlik stood a chance, you were just wanting to start a Pavlik Bashing party.

1st page PlugInBabies posts showed why he is an elite poster from across the pond.