This one folks, of course. "Carnera lost SIX TIMES against men nobody even knows on this board before getting the title from Sharkey. Carnera lost SIX TIMES against men nobody even knows on this board before getting the title from Sharkey. Carnera lost SIX TIMES against men nobody even knows on this board before getting the title from Sharkey. What is this??? Fury is 25 - 0 PLUS Klitschko > Sharkey in every way you want to turn it!"
You can't really compare their resumes as if they are similar. Fury's resume is a sea of commonwealth grade opponents. He only ever fought one opponent ranked in the top ten. It obviously helps his case that this man was the best heavyweight of our generation, and that he won the fight! That still makes him a one hit winder for now. Carnera was matched hard by comparison, and matched often, and his resume has the scars to show for it. If you look at who they rounded up, Fury has the better scalp, but Carnera has by far the better pile!
He wasnt that fluent in the English language when he was a fighter.After watching Louis on film he said," I zee sometings ,but I wont tell".its on film.