Prince Naseem Hamed: A Career Retrospective

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by El Cepillo, Nov 21, 2008.


  1. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    I wrote this article, and it is on the main page, wonder if anyone had any thoughts or opinions on the article of Hamed himself?


    www.boxingnew24.com

    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected


    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected

    This content is protected


    This content is protected
     
  2. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Well written, good article, it's clear you care about the subject-matter, which is always nice to see.

    I disagree with most of it as I'm sure you would've guessed, especially that Boom Boom was his best win, for me it was undoubtedly Vuyani Bungu.

    I think you grossly overrate Naz, you think I underrate him severely - let's agree on that he was very talented, had great punch power, and that your article is quality.

    :good
     
  3. PH|LLA

    PH|LLA VIP Member Full Member

    79,438
    2,646
    Feb 1, 2007
    your mom should've called you Harry

    BTW if it wasn't for the prince, I might never have been introduced to boxing.

    fact.
     
  4. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Thanks for that, honestly, I haven't been watching boxing for that long, but I enjoyed doing the reaserch, and I appreciate it when people who know boxing as well as you do say that it's a good article.

    Just out of interest, why do Bungu was his best win?
     
  5. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    Bungu is the best fighter he ever fought other than MAB, and Naz was superb that night. OK, Bungu's career may not have been as good as Boom Boom's or vasquez's or even Kelley's or Medina's, but Naz fought them all when they were past their respective primes, whereas Bungu was a prime quality fighter holding wins over Danny Romero and Kennedy McKinney on his record (McKinney in particular was a very good fighter in the 90s).
     
  6. bandeedo

    bandeedo Loyal Member Full Member

    36,048
    24,031
    Feb 19, 2007
    i think prince was one of the best second tier fighters i have ever seen. there is a considerable difference in quality between first and second tier fighters that is often very hard to distinguish but it is there. prince could have made a much longer and richer boxing career if he would have avoided the very best like floyd seems to have done. i mean how many fighters out there are at marcos level?
     
  7. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    I would say that Oscar is the one resposible for introducing me to boxing, although since that introduction Hamed has become my favourite fighter, perhaps because I remeber when I was kid him being a really big deal, he has a lot of nostalgia value attached.
     
  8. catasyou

    catasyou Lucian Bute Full Member

    38,466
    21
    Apr 7, 2008
    Good article,the Prince was awesome
     
  9. El Cepillo

    El Cepillo Baddest Man on the Planet Full Member

    17,221
    4
    Aug 29, 2008
    Some good points. I think Hamed was always in with a chance of beating whoever he faced, because he had that power than could rock fighters to thier socks (as Kevin Kelley would say..). For me, a prime Barrera is at the very top of the tree in boxing, an A+ fighter, Hamed was A - or an A fighter, IMO. But that said, Hamed coming into the Barrera fight was a conflicted individual, his training was limited, his attitude was off, he had lost his hunger and perhaps his fighting heart already, and he got soundly beat. They are not excuses, becasue everyone knows how good Barrera was, but if Naz had been at the top of his game like he was against Johnson for example, a very tough opponent, then I think the result of the Berrara fight might have been a lot closer, or different altogether. Can't help look at Naz's carrer and think "what if...".
     
  10. BadJuju83

    BadJuju83 Bolivian Full Member

    3,941
    2
    Sep 19, 2008
    Good article bud, nice work.
     
  11. Rico Spadafora

    Rico Spadafora Master of Chins Full Member

    45,378
    3,791
    Feb 20, 2008
    he was an overhyped Glass Jawed fraud who quit the sport after he was embarrassed against MAB.
     
  12. DINAMITA

    DINAMITA Guest

    I hate the way people say Naz had a great chin/granite chin/iron chin etc, when really there is no evidence to support his chin is any better than decent, or at best good. But to say "Glass Jawed" is just stupid. He was never stopped, so what is the evidence for saying that??
     
  13. Boxing Fanatic

    Boxing Fanatic Loyal Member banned

    48,204
    9
    Sep 16, 2008
    Naz was one of my favorites. Unorthodox style of fighting, fun to watch. One loss to Barrera is the only thing most people remember about him. But, he was more than that. This article is on point. Talented, cocky sob. I wish he was still around doing his thing. Would of definitely won more titles if it wasn't for
    his bad boy ways.
     
  14. EL-MATADOR

    EL-MATADOR Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,760
    2
    Sep 25, 2008
    Excellent article bro :good
     
  15. theboy_racer

    theboy_racer Boxing Junkie banned

    8,843
    4
    Mar 4, 2006
    He was also not at his peak when he fought Barrera is what people forget and he lost on points.

    What i mean is he had lost focus and wasnt the same fighter he was under Brendan Ingle, he'd beat Barrera for me if he had been, and Morales and Pacman and JMM.

    Just imo, very underrated.