Prince Naz would have beaten Manny Pacquiao

That's a moot point, wasn't what I said AT ALL.

Naz has the bigger power at FW.....also, he did used to move a bit more before he realised he was one of the biggest hitters P4P at that time.

Similar to how Tyson used to create oppurtunities for combinations, but ended up winging punches knowing that if he landed he could end the fight.

Watch Naz vs. Barrera and watch Naz vs Steve Robinson. It isn't just the level of opponent that stunts Naz's boxing, and to be honest surely Naz would move away more against a better opponent and be more one-dimensional against a lesser fighter. He was lacklustre post-Kelley IMO.

Between 95-98 the man was a beast, Tom Johnson, Wilfredo Vasquez and Kelley were all good fighters. He also beat Medina back when Manuel was still decent, yet people, like with Hatton now, think he just bluffed his way through all the fights he won and was shown to be a sham as soon as he moved up.

Maybe Barrera was a good fighter, no? Pac lost to Morales the first time (winning gloves or not) I know it's crazy, but sometimes boxers lose.

Pac vs. Naz could be debated until the end, I just think Pac's overzealousness when he had an opponent hurt would be his downfall, as Naz would go down when he wasn't hurt due to being off-balance, and IMO would still have his wits about him when Pac steamed in for the kill.

ONLY MY OPINION, which in the great scheme of things means **** all but for a fantasy fight is just as valid as anyone else's in my view :good

 

Pacman KO

 

He would given Pac a lot of problems,and it would have been great to watch.I think a prime Naz would have been able to win this fight!