Prior To Their Bouts Who Did You Think Was The Better Fighter Sartison Or Lockette?

Didn't know anything about either.

 

Sartison, on the basis its difficult to be worse than Lockett having seen quite a bit of him.

 

i had never seen any of them

 

They both pretty much sucked?

 

Clearly Sartison, Lockett is really really not good.

 

Nobody knew what to expect from Sartison, not having seen him fight. But still an undefeated fighter with an impressive amateur career.

Lockett we knew was highly limited fighter.

In the end we all expected them to loose, which they did, Sartison did look better in defeat though.

 

this is a joke of a thread.

you can count on the fingers of your hands the number of esb members who had actually seen both fighters over the course of 2 or 3 fights to compare them in ablity.

i made some threads about sartison long before he met kessler on the european forum

posters like rafaelgonzal do not set foot in that section because to snipe at europeans in that section of esb would require some knowledge of the boxers .

since he has none , he has to post his drivel on the american orientated section of esb and hope that young cheerleaders back him up.

 

from posters who had never seen them.
gary lockett was never shown outside the uk
sartison was shown a few times in germany only on undercards .

who are these posters on this thread who have seen both fighters and could compare them and analyse there pro`s and cons and vote in your poll.

its like me starting a thread on tweedle dee and tweedle dum from iraq and tibet and saying who is the best out of these 2 fighters i have never seen and vote in my pole.

my pole would be meaningless just like yours.