Probably no HW unification in 2010

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by FROST, Nov 18, 2009.


Page 3 of 3
  1. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,901
    2,157
    Feb 8, 2008

    Yeah there were so many complaints about contracts from the klitschko's in the past right... Haye has had problems with both his first fight remember the Johnson fiasco then Rachman then Barrett... Haye in his own words said he had no prob with fighting both what happened

    Speaking to Setanta Sports News Haye admitted that the two-for-one contract was “being talked about”. He said:


    “To be number one in the world, to be the undisputed champion, I feel I’ve got to beat both of them anyway. That’s not a problem. I want to fight both of them. It’s down to the lawyers now.”
     
    kriszhao, Nov 19, 2009
    kriszhao, Nov 19, 2009
    #31
  2. FROST

    FROST Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,529
    76
    May 3, 2006
    Just read on the James Slater article on the ESB front page that Sauerland indeed intends to push for a Haye-Valuev rematch. Chris Meyer, Sauerlands crownprince, stated that. I've been following boxing long enough to be 95% certain that we're gonna see Haye-Valuev II right after Haye-Ruiz. No unification, sorry folks, and David Haye knew all along. If you sign a contract that includes a rematch clause, you know that the losing side will most probably make use of it. Hayes talk about unifying the belts after winning the WBA-belt was a bluff.
     
    FROST, Nov 20, 2009
    FROST, Nov 20, 2009
    #32
  3. FROST

    FROST Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,529
    76
    May 3, 2006
    Listen, Haye calling out the Klitschkos for a year and then having no interest in fighting them seems indeed very illogical - but it's exactly what happened. It seems like it was indeed a bluff, or an elaborate charade as you call it. Haye cheated all us boxing fans.

    And don't call me a fool. You would never do that face to face in the first place. Secondly, if you still think that Haye will be the saviour of the HW division, I guess you're the fool here.
     
    FROST, Nov 20, 2009
    FROST, Nov 20, 2009
    #33
  4. kriszhao

    kriszhao Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,901
    2,157
    Feb 8, 2008

    Yeah as far as Hayes talk it was all just hype he knew he'd lose to either brother so he used there name to build up his profile and then headed for the hills when it came time to back up his words. Heavyweight savior my ass!
     
    kriszhao, Nov 20, 2009
    kriszhao, Nov 20, 2009
    #34
  5. Caliboxing

    Caliboxing Boxing Junkie Full Member

    14,203
    4,556
    Sep 28, 2007
    Haye has Valuev's fake belt, so it's not like he's the final piece to the puzzle at HW. The WBA is a crooked joke.
     
    Caliboxing, Nov 20, 2009
    Caliboxing, Nov 20, 2009
    #35
  6. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,121
    2,761
    Jul 20, 2004
    With Con King still being there don't expect anything good to happen.
     
    Scar, Nov 20, 2009
    Scar, Nov 20, 2009
    #36
Page 3 of 3