Problem Solved, If manny takes test immediately after the fight?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by paddymickey, Dec 26, 2009.


  1. paddymickey

    paddymickey Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,532
    17
    Dec 5, 2008
    This content is protected
     
  2. kwyjibo

    kwyjibo O RLY? banned Full Member

    1,194
    0
    Oct 15, 2009
    Only professionals know how long stuff stays in the system. It could be so specific that by round 12 it's already gone. After the fight could be too late to detect something or whoever wins could just refuse to be tested - after all, the fight is already over. It must be before and after the fight.
     
  3. levluger

    levluger Active Member Full Member

    670
    0
    Jan 2, 2008
    PED's are typically used long before the fight to enhance the training leading up to the fight itself, in other words at that point he could show up clean regardless of whether or not he was juicing.
     
  4. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    22,661
    4
    Jan 6, 2008
    The issue is that even if he tested positive after the fight there could be severe damage to Mayweather that cannot be taken back as a result of Manny's PED's. For instance because PED's (if he's on them) lets say Manny brutalizes Mayweather like he did to Cotto, hatton, DLh and as a result Mayweather is never the same fighter again. Well in this scenario even if Manny was caught after the fight the damage is done to Mayweather and he won't be able to fulfil his legacy to it's full potential as a result. So after the fight is too late.
     
  5. namsu55

    namsu55 Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,782
    7
    Sep 24, 2008
    Agree. Whatever the case, Manny should just adhere to the tests however they do need to consider time period before the fight when taking blood, as he says it drains and what do we know it may do. As long as there is one 30 days before the fight and straight after the fight isn't that enough.
     
  6. paddymickey

    paddymickey Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,532
    17
    Dec 5, 2008
    --------------------------------------
    could they do a lie detector test instead?
     
  7. laffie

    laffie Montreal Full Member

    12,846
    1
    Jan 5, 2008
    Sir, there have been dozens of posts explaining all that. Could you read a little instead of making a new thread on the subject?

    Thanks.